i thing it like 130
Improved :-
It is XXL = XXX = 30
250Improved Answer:-XXL = -20+50 = 30
In Roman numerals XXL is the equivalent of 30 because they mean -20+50 = 30
XXL is not a valid numeral. You can use X (10) and XL (40), or you can use XX (20) and L (50), but you cannot use XXL.
It is equivalent to: XXX = 30 in Roman numerals. It also means extra, extra large.
XXL = 50
250Improved Answer:-XXL = -20+50 = 30
In Roman numerals XXL is the equivalent of 30 because they mean -20+50 = 30
XXL is not a valid numeral. You can use X (10) and XL (40), or you can use XX (20) and L (50), but you cannot use XXL.
It is equivalent to: XXX = 30 in Roman numerals. It also means extra, extra large.
XXL = 50
It is technically not a valid Roman numeral.Proper Roman numerals proceed in descending order unless it's a "subtractive" numeral. Subtractive numerals are alwayspaired with a larger numeral. And if used as a subtractive numeral, the subtracting character should not appear elsewhere. XXL is invalid because it violates at least two rules. Two X's (10) occur before the larger L (50), and a second X exists with the XL (40) subtractive pair.The following arrangements are valid:XL (50 - 10 = 40) is valid (XL is a subtractive pair)MCM (1000 + (1000 - 100)) = 1900) is valid (1000 > 900, and CM is a subtractive pair).
XXL is not a valid roman numeral.
There are many but roman numerals refer tohindu arrabic numerals
XLV in roman numerals = 45
XXL is a clothing size, not a number. You've probably transposed it from LXX, which is 50 + 10 + 10 = 70. If it were a number, it would be XX = 20 before (therefore subtracted from) V, which is 50, making 30. As XXX is commonly understood to be 30, then there's no advantage in less numerals used with XXL - so it is kept purely for sizing clothes.
Well first of all XXL is 50. Not XXL is the Roman Numeral for 50. XXL in clothing stands for:eXtra eXtra Large. Sizing in America.
Many do, but not all clock towers use roman numerals.