That would depend on the resolution of the printing. If for example, it is 100 pixels per inch, then 2 ft = 24 in (times 100 pix per inch) = 2400 x 2400 = 5,760,000
*****
From a mathematical perspective, the answer is sound. From a Photography perspective, the asker should know that it is a relationship between the "resolution" that the image was taken at versus the size of the viewed image. The reason for the quotes is in my last sentence.
In a 640x320 image (A), there are twice as many pixels in both directions than one of 320x160 (B). Therefore, the A image is twice the length and height as the B image and the pixels and spaces between are no different in size from one picture to the other. Thus there is no difference in the eye's ability to "resolve" the spaces in between for a given viewing distance. What does matter is the size that the images are rendered at. To make this as simple as possible, it is best to compare photographs printed from these two images. An 8x10 from A will look better because there are more pixels crammed in a given inch than there will be in picture B, thus your eye's ability to resolve the spaces between them is not as good.
So how many pixels are in an inch for a GIVEN photo size depends on the "resolution" of the image file versus the size it is viewed at. The "resolution of the printing" is a matter for the printer or machine that creates the print, and that is another animal altogether.
The problem is, pixel count is not supported as a measure of digital photograph resolution by international standards even though it is used by just about everybody. Hopefully, my answer sheds some light as to why.
It means that the photos that the camera will take, will have 2 million pixels in one photo.
Any photo that isn't a 3-dimensional photo is a 2-dimensional photo.
If you are shooting in Jpg format, what most people use, and each photo is 12 mega pixels the average size of each photo will come out to be about 2.5 MB, allowing the card to hold about 798 photos. If you were shooting in raw each photo would be a size of about 18 MB allowing you to fit about 112 photos on the card. So if you shoot in raw and empty your card frequently a 2 GB memory card will fit enough photos in with no prob. I have a 2 GB card and shoot Jpg and have never ran out of room.
Hi, Truth is, just like with digital cameras, the higher the better. It all translates to resolution of the picture image. The more pixels, the more detail that's available. Of course, usually the price is higher as well. Hope that helps, Cubby
Good for what? 300k pixel cameras take pictures 640 pix across x 480 pix wide, which at 300dpi (the size needed for a printer) is a little over 2 x 1.5 inches. You can make good pictures for Facebook with a file that size. You can't make a 4x6 photo out of it, or anything like that.
The size of a stamp size photo in India is 2 cm x 2.5 cm. In pixels it is 56.69 pixels x 70.87 pixels.
2 mega-pixels 2 mega-pixels
It means that the photos that the camera will take, will have 2 million pixels in one photo.
The iPad 1 and iPad 2 both had a resolution of 1024x768, for a total of 786432 pixels.
(9) x (number of pixels per inch)2
The oldest digital camera had enough resolution for a website banner. If the banner is to be 500 pixels across by 100 pixels down, the total pixels would be 500x100 or 5000 pixels. 1 Megapixel/5000pixels = .2 MP (that's POINT 2 Megapixels!).
about 16
2 mega pixel
The resolution of a 2-megapixel image is 1920 pixels by 1080 pixels.
2 feet is 2 feet.
To determine the number of pixels in a 2 by 3 picture, you need to multiply the width by the height. If the dimensions are in inches, for example, the pixel count would depend on the image's resolution (DPI). However, if you're simply referring to a grid of 2 by 3, it consists of 6 individual units or "pixels."
It's got a simple 2 megapixel camera.