0
No because 1.8 is larger than 1.45
Wiki User
∙ 6y ago
Wiki User
∙ 6y agoNo, 1.8 is larger than 1.45 by 0.35
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Which is larger 145m or 145km?
There are 1000 metres in one kilometre. Therefore, 145 kilometres is one thousand times larger than 145 metres.
Which is larger 145 cm or 1.5 m?
1.5 m is larger.
The sum of two numbers is 17 and the sum of their square is 145 What is the larger number?
9 (81 + 64 = 145)
Is 5 over 6 larger than 8 over 9?
5/6 = 15/18
Supplementary angles if one of two supplementary angles is 35 larger than the other find the measure of the smaller angle?
180 - 35 = 145. Half of 145 is 72.5 which is the smaller angle. (The other angle is 35 + 72.5 ie 107.5)
Are 145 Meters larger than 145 Kilometers?
No, there are 1000 Meters to a Kilometer.
Is 145 cm greater than 1.5 m of fabric?
1.5 meters would be larger than 145 centimeters.
Which is larger 145m or 145km?
There are 1000 metres in one kilometre. Therefore, 145 kilometres is one thousand times larger than 145 metres.
Is 145 m or 145 km is larger?
145 km
What is larger 145 m 145 km?
145m
What measurment is larger 145m or 145 km?
It is: 145 km
Which is longer 145 m or 145 km?
145 Miles. 1 Kilometer is slightly more than 3/5ths of 1 mile. Therefore, 145 kilometers is approximately, 90 miles; reversely, 145 miles is approximately equal to 233 kilometers.
Can the greatest common factor of 18 and 36 be larger than 18?
No.
Which is larger 145 cm or 1.5 m?
1.5 m is larger.
How many 8 go into 145?
18 of them with a remainder of 1
How many 8 can go into 145?
18 with 1 remaining 145 - 1 = 144 = 8 x 18
What are all the multiples of 145?
It is not possible to give all the multiples of any number (other than zero) since there is no end to them. If x were the largest multiple of 145 then x+145 is a multiple of 145 and it is larger than x. So x is not the largest multiple of 145. So there are an infinite number of multiples. The first 15 multiples of 145: 145, 290, 435, 580, 725, 870, 1015, 1160, 1305, 1450, 1595, 1740, 1885, 2030, 2175 . . .
