Good for what? Telescope? Microscope? "Magnification" is often used as a marketing tool; telescopes for example might come with a maximum magnification that is too big to get a clear image, just so they can claim "100x magnification" or whatever. And it is cheap to get a magnification that is clearly too much. The most important piece of information about a telescope is, how big is the main lens, or the main mirror. A larger diameter here will give you (a) more light-gathering power, allowing you to see fainter stars, and (b) more resolution, roughly equivalent to usefulmagnification.
Good for what? Telescope? Microscope? "Magnification" is often used as a marketing tool; telescopes for example might come with a maximum magnification that is too big to get a clear image, just so they can claim "100x magnification" or whatever. And it is cheap to get a magnification that is clearly too much. The most important piece of information about a telescope is, how big is the main lens, or the main mirror. A larger diameter here will give you (a) more light-gathering power, allowing you to see fainter stars, and (b) more resolution, roughly equivalent to usefulmagnification.
Good for what? Telescope? Microscope? "Magnification" is often used as a marketing tool; telescopes for example might come with a maximum magnification that is too big to get a clear image, just so they can claim "100x magnification" or whatever. And it is cheap to get a magnification that is clearly too much. The most important piece of information about a telescope is, how big is the main lens, or the main mirror. A larger diameter here will give you (a) more light-gathering power, allowing you to see fainter stars, and (b) more resolution, roughly equivalent to usefulmagnification.
Good for what? Telescope? Microscope? "Magnification" is often used as a marketing tool; telescopes for example might come with a maximum magnification that is too big to get a clear image, just so they can claim "100x magnification" or whatever. And it is cheap to get a magnification that is clearly too much. The most important piece of information about a telescope is, how big is the main lens, or the main mirror. A larger diameter here will give you (a) more light-gathering power, allowing you to see fainter stars, and (b) more resolution, roughly equivalent to usefulmagnification.
Yes. Good job.
10*100 = 1000 times.
100+100+2310 = 2510
YES!
60 plus 9 plus 100 minus 100 equals 69,see 60 + 9 = 69, 69 + 100 = 169 - 100 = 69 and that is the awnser to 60 plus 9 plus 100 minus 100.
The total magnification is the product of the magnification of the eyepiece and the magnification of the objective lens. In this case, it would be 10 (eyepiece) * 10 (objective) = 100 times total magnification.
The total magnification of a microscope is found by multiplying the ocular and objective together.
Yes. Good job.
10*100 = 1000 times.
Yes, the total magnification of a compound microscope is calculated by multiplying the magnification of the eyepiece by the magnification of the objective lens. The eyepiece typically magnifies by 10x, so it is often the standard starting point for calculating total magnification.
It increases the magnification of the screen. CTRL plus _ does the reverse.
The magnification power of modern microscopes is amazing.
100%
The total magnification is equal to the magnification of the eyepiece multiplied by the magnification of the objective lens. So in this case the objective lens would need to be 100X.
108 remainder 3 :D
A magnification of 12x42 for binoculars is considered good for general use, providing a clear and detailed view of distant objects.
its really good question that i know!!!by ur momma