No. 3 x 9 is 27. 3 x 900 is 2700, but as this is closer to 30 x 900, which would be 27000, then 2750 is much too small.
No. 3 x 9 is 27. 3 x 900 is 2700, but as this is closer to 30 x 900, which would be 27000, then 2750 is much too small.
No.900 * 3 = 2700 so 900 * 30 = 27000 and then 917*33 will be larger still. So it is an extremely poor answer.
917 x 33 = 30,261
Thirty-three parts out of one hundred
The numerator and denominator have no common factor except ' 1 '.
The GCF of 31 and 33 is 1. If the GCF of a numerator and denominator is 1, the fraction is in its simplest form.
No, it misses the mark by more than a power of 10.
No.900 * 3 = 2700 so 900 * 30 = 27000 and then 917*33 will be larger still. So it is an extremely poor answer.
33% of 2750= 33% * 2750= 0.33 * 2750= 907.5
917 x 33 = 30,261
Thirty-three parts out of one hundred
The numerator and denominator have no common factor except ' 1 '.
The GCF of 31 and 33 is 1. If the GCF of a numerator and denominator is 1, the fraction is in its simplest form.
The most reasonable way to solve this is to find the two greatest numbers that will add to 65. This is 32 and 33. So if we multiply 32 * 33, you will get 1056.
47 - 2 = 4545 - 3 = 4242 - 4 = 3838 - 5 = 33So 33 seems reasonable
30/33 is not simplest form. It is 10/11.
Yes, because a composite number is any number that has more prime factors other than one and itself . The prime factors of 33 are 3 and 11.
That he wanted to find a route to India and sailed for 33 days. He found an island instead.