Yes.
47 + 168k hours where k is any integer.47 + 168k hours where k is any integer.47 + 168k hours where k is any integer.47 + 168k hours where k is any integer.
47 is an integer so there is no sensible way to turn it into a fraction. A valid equivalent fraction is 47/1.
They are: 71+(-24) = 47
47 is an integer and not a fraction. However, it can be expressed in rational form as 47/1 which cannot be simplified.
Since 47 is a prime number, the only common positive integer factor of the two numbers is 1.
47 + 168k hours where k is any integer.47 + 168k hours where k is any integer.47 + 168k hours where k is any integer.47 + 168k hours where k is any integer.
47 is a whole number, integer and rational.
47 is an integer and so has no common fraction.
47, 94, 141, 188, 235
47 is an integer so there is no sensible way to turn it into a fraction. A valid equivalent fraction is 47/1.
47 is an integer and not a fraction. However, it can be expressed in rational form as 47/1 which cannot be simplified.
The first three positive integer multiples of 47 are: 47 x 1 = 47 47 x 2 = 94 47 x 3 = 141
There are infinitely many. They are any ratios of the form 47*k : k where k is an integer.
They are: 71+(-24) = 47
47 is an integer and not a fraction. However, it can be expressed in rational form as 47/1 which cannot be simplified.
47 is an integer and so there is no sensible way of writing it as a fraction or mixed number.
The positive integer factors of 235 are: 1, 5, 47, 235