Multiples of 9 and 6 are also divisible by three, the reverse is not true. 15 is divisible by 3, but not 6 or 9. 27 is divisible by 3 and 9, but not 6. 12 is divisible by 3 and 6, but not 9. 54 is divisible by 3, 6 and 9.
No, 6 is not divisible by 148. In order for one number to be divisible by another, the first number must be a multiple of the second number. In this case, 6 is not a multiple of 148 as it is much smaller. Therefore, 6 is not divisible by 148.
Yes, 258 is divisible by 6, since 43 x 6 = 258
It isn't. 438 is divisible by 6 because 438 is a multiple of 6.
Using the tests for divisibility:Divisible by 3:Add the digits and if the sum is divisible by 3, so is the original number: 6 + 8 + 4 = 18 which is divisible by 3, so 684 is divisible by 3Divisible by 6:Number is divisible by 2 and 3: Divisible by 2:If the number is even (last digit divisible by 2), then the whole number is divisible by 2. 684 is even so 684 is divisible by 2.Divisible by 3:Already shown above to be divisible by 3. 684 is divisible by both 2 & 3 so 684 is divisible by 6Divisible by 9:Add the digits and if the sum is divisible by 9, so is the original number: 6 + 8 + 4 = 18 which is divisible by 9, so 684 is divisible by 9Thus 684 is divisible by all 3, 6 & 9.
By "Why" I guess you mean "what test can be used to find the divisibility" as opposed to "showing what multiple works".Test of divisibility by4If last 2 digits divisible by 4, the whole number is divisible by 4. 564 → 64 which is divisible by 4 (64 = 4 x 16), so 564 is divisible by 4(564 = 4 x 141)66 = 2 x 3, so the number must pass both the divisibility tests for 2 & 3: 2The number is even (the last digit is divisible by 2) 564 → 4 which is even (4 = 2 x 2), so 564 is divisible by 2(564 = 2 x 282)3Add the digits together and if the resulting number is divisible by 3, so is the original number. 564 → 5 + 6 + 4 = 15 which is divisible by 3 (15 = 3 x 5), so 564 is divisible by 3(564 = 3 x 188)564 passes both tests, so it is divisible by 6 (564 = 6 x 94)9Add the digits together and if the resulting number is divisible by 9, so is the original number 564 → 5 + 6 + 4 = 15 which is not divisible by 9, so 564 is not divisible by 9Thus 564 is divisible by 4 and 6, but not by 9.In the tests for 3 and 9, if the result of the addition is more than 1 digit, the test can be reapplied to the result of the addition, so if the digits of sum are added together until a single digit remains, thenif the digit is 3, 6 or 9, it is divisible by 3 and so the original number is divisible by 3if it is 9, then the original number is also divisible by 9.
Yes. It goes in 188 times. --------------------------------------- To be divisible by 3, sum the digits of the number and if this sum is divisible by 3, then the original number is divisible by 3. As the test can be repeated on the sum, repeat the summing until a single digit remains; only if this number is one of {3, 6, 9} is the original number divisible by 3. For 564 this gives: 564 → 5 + 6 + 4 = 15 15 → 1 + 5 = 6 6 is one of {3, 6,9} so 564 is divisible by 3.
564 is a composite number (it is divisible by 2).
564 ÷ 6 = 94
It is even because it is divisible by 2 with no remainder
564
94. The nearest multiple of 6 before 567 is 564, and 564/6 = 94. However, 567/6 = 94.5
They are 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 12, 47, 94, 141, 188, 282, and 564.
6 is not divisible by 162. 162 is divisible by 6.
If it is divisible by 2 and 3, it is divisible by 6.
if a number is divisible by 2 and 3 then its divisible by 6
If a number is divisible by 2 and 3, it is divisible by 6.