no it is not 4 is a perfect cube
No, it is not possible to build a larger cube using exactly nine smaller cubes. A larger cube must have a volume that is a perfect cube itself (e.g., 1^3, 2^3, 3^3, etc.). Nine cubes have a total volume of 9, which does not correspond to the volume of any larger cube, as the next perfect cube is 27 (3^3). Therefore, you cannot form a larger cube with exactly nine smaller cubes.
No, 148 is not a perfect cube.
No, 2 is neither a perfect square nor a perfect cube.
Because they are square/cube of an integer.
It is both because 1,000,000 is a perfect cube and a perfect square number
No, it is not possible to build a larger cube using exactly nine smaller cubes. A larger cube must have a volume that is a perfect cube itself (e.g., 1^3, 2^3, 3^3, etc.). Nine cubes have a total volume of 9, which does not correspond to the volume of any larger cube, as the next perfect cube is 27 (3^3). Therefore, you cannot form a larger cube with exactly nine smaller cubes.
If by cube you mean perfect cube (a cube of an integer), then no, and the nearest perfect cube is 81.
No, 148 is not a perfect cube.
No, 2 is neither a perfect square nor a perfect cube.
Because they are square/cube of an integer.
It is both because 1,000,000 is a perfect cube and a perfect square number
A cube root of a perfect cube has only one dimension. A perfect cube is a number that can be obtained by multiplying an integer by itself three times. Taking the cube root of a perfect cube will give you the original integer value, effectively reducing the dimensionality back to one.
Not a perfect cube.
There is not a number that is a perfect square and perfect cube between 1 and 25.There is not a number that is a perfect square and perfect cube between 1 and 25.There is not a number that is a perfect square and perfect cube between 1 and 25.There is not a number that is a perfect square and perfect cube between 1 and 25.
81 is a perfect squarebecause 81 = 9*9. It is NOT a perfect cube.
It is not a perfect cube.
A perfect cube is.