The final step is the 'dismissal' or the 'excusing' of the witness signifying that both sides of the case are finished with the witness and they are free to depart the court.
It would at least be considered unethical and further may taint the entire case. Because if a witness made an identification as a result of an officer's suggestion(s), the defense could challenge both the witness's and the officer's integrity and credibility. If you want to conclude the these aspects make the actions illegal, well.......
Yes. This is called discovery: both sides are required to show theit lists of evidence and witness so that they can be challenged.
"Questioning" is the present participle or gerund form of the verb "question", but in a sentence, the single word "questioning" or a phrase introduced by this word usually functions as a noun element (for the gerund) or an adjective or adverb element (for the participle.)
If that occurs, then both sides lose.If that occurs, then both sides lose.If that occurs, then both sides lose.If that occurs, then both sides lose.If that occurs, then both sides lose.If that occurs, then both sides lose.
Ventanazul
No. A third party who is not mentioned in the will should act as witness.
500 people on both sides
Both sides.
what is located on both sides of the waterfall
what is both sides of potato called
4M + 5 = 9Subtract 5 from both sides: 4M = 4Divide both sides by 4: M = 14M + 5 = 9Subtract 5 from both sides: 4M = 4Divide both sides by 4: M = 14M + 5 = 9Subtract 5 from both sides: 4M = 4Divide both sides by 4: M = 14M + 5 = 9Subtract 5 from both sides: 4M = 4Divide both sides by 4: M = 1