To chuck is to throw. It is a verb, with a present and past tense. It can also be used as a metaphor, not literally, for "throw (out)".
I tried to chuck the wad of paper but missed the wastebasket.
He decided to chuck what he wrote and start over. --- Here, he is not actually throwing anything, but the word chuck is used as a metaphor for throwing (something out or away from him).
I wanted to chuck the dress I started to sew, but I didn't have time to make a different dress.
The man chucked the cut logs onto the pile. His wife sorted the chucked logs and stacked them into neat rows against the house.
In the tongue twister, "chuck" is used as a verb to describe the action of throwing or moving something (wood, in this case) with force. The phrase plays on the sound similarity between a woodchuck (a groundhog-like animal) and the action of chucking wood.
they really just mean "cut"
Woodchuck Tongue twister:How much wood would a woodchuck chuckif a woodchuck could chuck wood?And in reply:He would chuck, he would, as much as he could,and chuck as much wood as a woodchuck wouldif a woodchuck could chuck wood.
Woodchuck Tongue Twister:How much wood would a woodchuck chuckif a woodchuck could chuck wood?Answer given in reply;He would chuck, he would, as much as he could,and chuck as much wood as a woodchuck wouldif a woodchuck could chuck wood.
How much wood would a woodchuck chuck if a woodchuck could chuck wood?He would chuck, he would, as much as he could, and chuck as much woodAs a woodchuck would if a woodchuck could chuck wood. Is the full version.
"North Carolina nutmegs" is a tongue twister that can be tricky to say quickly and clearly.
The tongue twister is:How much wood would a woodchuck chuckif a woodchuck could chuck wood?And in reply:He would chuck, he would, as much as he could,and chuck as much wood as a woodchuck wouldif a woodchuck could chuck wood.Words containing a w in the question are these:woodwouldwoodchuckwoodchuckwoodIn the reply:wouldwouldwoodwoodchuckwouldwoodchuckwood.So in the primary question, 5 w's, and in the reply, 7 w's, for a total of 12.
Woodchuck Tongue twister:How much wood would a woodchuck chuckif a woodchuck could chuck wood?And in reply:He would chuck, he would, as much as he could,and chuck as much wood as a woodchuck wouldif a woodchuck could chuck wood.
The origin of the tongue twister is unknown: "How much wood a wood chuck could chuck if a wood chuck could chuck wood."
The origin of this tongue twister is unknown.It reads:How much wood would a woodchuck chuckif a woodchuck could chuck wood?And the reply is:He would chuck, he would, as much as he could,and chuck as much wood as a woodchuck wouldif a woodchuck could chuck wood.
"North Carolina nutmegs" is a tongue twister that can be tricky to say quickly and clearly.
The origin is unknown.
How much wood would a woodchuck chuck if a woodchuck could chuck wood There is an aswer to it as well: A woodchuck would chuck all the wood if a woodchuck could chuck wood
How much wood would a woodchuck chuck if a woodchuck could chuck wood?He would chuck, he would, as much as he could, and chuck as much woodAs a woodchuck would if a woodchuck could chuck wood. Is the full version.
Woodchuck Tongue Twister:How much wood would a woodchuck chuckif a woodchuck could chuck wood?Answer given in reply;He would chuck, he would, as much as he could,and chuck as much wood as a woodchuck wouldif a woodchuck could chuck wood.
The original tongue-twister is of unknown origin. In it,"How much wood would a woodchuck chuck if a woodchuck could chuck wood?is paired with"A woodchuck would chuck all the wood he could if a woodchuck could chuck wood."or"As much wood as a woodchuck would, if a woodchuck could chuck wood."
The tongue twister is:How much wood would a woodchuck chuckif a woodchuck could chuck wood?And in reply:He would chuck, he would, as much as he could,and chuck as much wood as a woodchuck wouldif a woodchuck could chuck wood.Words containing a w in the question are these:woodwouldwoodchuckwoodchuckwoodIn the reply:wouldwouldwoodwoodchuckwouldwoodchuckwood.So in the primary question, 5 w's, and in the reply, 7 w's, for a total of 12.
It is not a joke, it is a very old tongue twister. Its origin is unknown It goes: How much wood could a woodchuck chuck if a woodchuck could chuck wood. (would or could can be used).
No, it's just a very old tongue twister, but it's easy to see how anyone could think that