the conversion of matter into energy, especially the mutual conversion of a particle and an antiparticle into electromagnetic radiation.Above is the definition, that is given for annihilation, on Google.
The positron and electron annihilate into two gamma rays.
As per the equation of Einstein, you have E = m * C square.
Now that the mass of electron and positron is same. So you put the mass of both into the formula.
You get 2 E = 2 m * C square.
You divide this equation by 2.
You get, E = m * C square.
That means from one positron, you get one gamma ray.
That means from one electron, you get one gamma ray.
That means from one gamma ray, you get one electron.
That means from 2 gamma rays, you get 2 electrons.
( Just multiply the equation by 2.)
(Here C is the speed of light. It is very high figure. The square of the speed of light is too high a figure.
it's about 300,000,000 m/s. The square of 300,000,000 comes to be 90,000,000,000,000,000.)
The electron is supposed to be the smallest mass in the atom. The photon emitted is supposed to be the smallest unit of energy. So if you multiply the one electron by the figure 90,000,000,000,000,00, you get minimum 90,000,000,000,000,000 photons emitted. From the positron also you should get the same amount of energy got released. Gamma ray is high frequency photon emitted. Only two gamma rays are emitted. "Two gamma rays are produced out of the mass of two electrons (or positrons) into energy" is the most not so wise statement I have ever encountered.
So the mass to energy ratio just does not match.
So either the equation of the Einstein is wrong, or the definition of the annihilation is wrong.
Here the definition of annihilation is wrong.
The fact is that mass get destructed into nothing in case of annihilation. The gamma rays come from the kinetic energy of the electron and positron. Mathematically one of the two gamma rays is anti-gamma ray and other is gamma ray.
It comes that mass of the electron is plus m. The mass of the positron is minus m.
The plus m + minus m = 0.
So from zero, you get positron and electron.
So from zero you get matter and anti-matter.
Hence proved.
It depends
A suitable pair for the analogies of annihilation and obliteration could be "creation and formation." While annihilation and obliteration both imply complete destruction or removal, creation and formation represent the processes of bringing something into existence or shaping it. These pairs illustrate opposing concepts within their respective contexts.
An object is said to be in uniform motion when it goes in a constant straight line. Motion is the part of the mechanics branch of physics.
An analogy for annihilation and obliteration could be comparing them to a candle being snuffed out in the wind. Just as the flame is extinguished and leaves no trace behind, annihilation refers to the complete destruction of something, while obliteration emphasizes the thoroughness of that destruction, rendering it unrecognizable or nonexistent. Both processes evoke a sense of finality and the loss of identity.
This makes it possible to give a precise formal definition of both the derivative, and the definite integral - which are both extremely useful concepts in math, physics, and engineering.
jesus was here!!
Annihilation means complete and total destruction.
Physics is the science of motion and does not have anything to do with economics.
In particle physics, the process of quark-antiquark annihilation contributes to the creation of high-energy particles by converting the mass energy of the quark and antiquark into new particles. This process releases a large amount of energy, which can result in the formation of high-energy particles such as mesons or photons.
All physics deals with energy and matter. In effect that is almost a complete definition of what Physics IS.
Annihilation reaction is when you take matter and anti-matter and try to put them together and they cancel each other out. Try putting an electron and a positron together. What happens? They will cancel each other out.
it is the branch of physics that deals with the structure and the behaviour of an atom is called atomic physics
Since everything we encounter in the physical world is, by definition, physics, physics applies to everything--including elementary teachers.
In physics, rest refers to an object that is not moving or changing its position relative to a reference point.
The definition of nanodispersion is a concept that is used in physics. This involves particles that are nanosized creating dispersion.
G. M. Hood has written: 'The temperature dependence of positron annihilation in a-Hf' -- subject(s): Photochemistry, Titanium, Physics, Zirconium
In physics, "rest" refers to an object that is not moving or changing its position relative to a reference point.