The front end estimate is 2000. But estimating a single number, in isolation and without context, is a complete waste of time. It all comes down to the context of what needs to be done with the number.
If I had to add 1600 to 1 trillion, I would estimate it as 0.
If I had to add 1600 to 0.0000000001, I would use the number as given. If I had to divide it by 30, I would estimate it as 1590, because 1590/30 = 159/3 = 53. If I had to divide it by 33, I would estimate the answer as follows:1600/33 = 1600/(100/3) = 1600*(3/100) = (1600/100)*3 = 16*3 = 48.
[exact answer = 48.4848... ]
100 x 16 = 1600
yes, 1600 is a whole number. simply put, a whole number is a number without fractions or decimals.
The square root of 1600 is 40. (40x40=1600)
you're not going to find an exact number. I'm not sure if you could even find an estimate.
The current estimate is about 1600.
It is: (1600+2200)/2 = 1900
The square root of 1600 is 40 …
To find 40 percent of a number, multiply the number by 0.4. In this instance, 0.4 x 1600 = 640. Therefore, 40 percent of 1600 is equal to 640.
To find 0.25 percent of a number, multiply the number by 0.0025. In this instance, 0.0025 x 1600 = 4. Therefore, 0.25 percent of 1600 is equal to 4.
To find 40 percent of a number, multiply the number by 0.4. In this instance, 0.4 x 1600 = 640. Therefore, 40 percent of 1600 is equal to 640.
no. why would it be?
To find 4 percent of a number, multiply the number by 0.04. In this instance, 0.04 x 1600 = 64. Therefore, 4 percent of 1600 is equal to 64.