The front end estimate is 2000. But estimating a single number, in isolation and without context, is a complete waste of time. It all comes down to the context of what needs to be done with the number.
If I had to add 1600 to 1 trillion, I would estimate it as 0.
If I had to add 1600 to 0.0000000001, I would use the number as given. If I had to divide it by 30, I would estimate it as 1590, because 1590/30 = 159/3 = 53. If I had to divide it by 33, I would estimate the answer as follows:1600/33 = 1600/(100/3) = 1600*(3/100) = (1600/100)*3 = 16*3 = 48.
[exact answer = 48.4848... ]
100 x 16 = 1600
you're not going to find an exact number. I'm not sure if you could even find an estimate.
The current estimate is about 1600.
The square root of 1600 is 40. (40x40=1600)
yes, 1600 is a whole number. simply put, a whole number is a number without fractions or decimals.
It is: (1600+2200)/2 = 1900
The square root of 1600 is 40 …
To find 40 percent of a number, multiply the number by 0.4. In this instance, 0.4 x 1600 = 640. Therefore, 40 percent of 1600 is equal to 640.
To find 40 percent of a number, multiply the number by 0.4. In this instance, 0.4 x 1600 = 640. Therefore, 40 percent of 1600 is equal to 640.
To find 0.25 percent of a number, multiply the number by 0.0025. In this instance, 0.0025 x 1600 = 4. Therefore, 0.25 percent of 1600 is equal to 4.
no. why would it be?
To find 4 percent of a number, multiply the number by 0.04. In this instance, 0.04 x 1600 = 64. Therefore, 4 percent of 1600 is equal to 64.