A parallelogram.
A parallelogram.
A parallelogram.
A parallelogram.
A rectangle.
parallegram
Parrallelogram (it has rotational symmetry but no lines of symmetry)
The quadrilaterals that always have both line symmetry and rotational symmetry are squares and rectangles. Squares have four lines of symmetry and rotational symmetry of order 4, while rectangles have two lines of symmetry and rotational symmetry of order 2. Other quadrilaterals, like rhombuses and parallelograms, may have one type of symmetry but not both. Thus, squares and rectangles are the only quadrilaterals that consistently possess both symmetries.
Yes, both triangles and squares have lines of symmetry and rotational symmetry. An equilateral triangle has three lines of symmetry and a rotational symmetry of order 3, meaning it can be rotated by 120 degrees and still look the same. A square has four lines of symmetry and a rotational symmetry of order 4, allowing it to be rotated by 90 degrees and still appear unchanged. Other types of triangles and quadrilaterals may have different numbers of symmetries based on their specific shapes.
A regular hexagon has 6 rotational symmetries (rotational symmetry of order six) and 6 reflective symmetries (six lines of symmetry).
a trapezium
parallelogram
Parallelogram.
how many lines of symmetry has an equilateral triangle
A rectangle.
parallegram
Parrallelogram (it has rotational symmetry but no lines of symmetry)
I believe that it is 0, 1 or 6 lines of symmetry and rotational symmetries of order 1, 2, 3 or 6
A rhombus is a quadrilateral that has no line of symmetry but has rotation symmetry. Rotation symmetry means that the shape can be rotated by a certain degree and still look the same. In the case of a rhombus, it has rotational symmetry of order 2, meaning it can be rotated by 180 degrees and still appear unchanged.
no shape does! * * * * * Not true. A parallelogram has rotational symmetry of order 2, but no lines of symmetry.
A sphere has one point of symmetry (at its very center) if one considers rotational symmetry in its three dimensions. If one is only considering reflectional symmetry, it would have an infinite number of lines of symmetry.