There is no specific name.
I hope you were not looking for volume as an answer because that is wrong. The fact that the cubes are of unspecified size means that there is no proper measure of anything. Also, if you tried to fill most 3-d figures with cubes, you would have corners and curves that were left out, and so the number of cubes could not measure volume even if their sizes were specified.
There is no specific name.
I hope you were not looking for volume as an answer because that is wrong. The fact that the cubes are of unspecified size means that there is no proper measure of anything. Also, if you tried to fill most 3-d figures with cubes, you would have corners and curves that were left out, and so the number of cubes could not measure volume even if their sizes were specified.
There is no specific name.
I hope you were not looking for volume as an answer because that is wrong. The fact that the cubes are of unspecified size means that there is no proper measure of anything. Also, if you tried to fill most 3-d figures with cubes, you would have corners and curves that were left out, and so the number of cubes could not measure volume even if their sizes were specified.
There is no specific name.
I hope you were not looking for volume as an answer because that is wrong. The fact that the cubes are of unspecified size means that there is no proper measure of anything. Also, if you tried to fill most 3-d figures with cubes, you would have corners and curves that were left out, and so the number of cubes could not measure volume even if their sizes were specified.
There is no specific name.
I hope you were not looking for volume as an answer because that is wrong. The fact that the cubes are of unspecified size means that there is no proper measure of anything. Also, if you tried to fill most 3-d figures with cubes, you would have corners and curves that were left out, and so the number of cubes could not measure volume even if their sizes were specified.
That depends: * On the size of the 3D object * On the size of the cubes
As long as the cubes are 1x1x1 then any box with an equivalent volume would hold the same number of cubes. The volume of the 3x4x10 box is 120. So a box with the dimensions 1x1x120 would work just as well as a box with the dimensions 12x10x1 or 2x5x12.
7=84 --=-- 10=x 7x=840 ---=---- 7 = 7 x = 120 x equals how many oz 10 cubes can hold
2 cubes wide x 3 cubes long x 4 cubes high. 2 X 3 X4 6 X 4 24 cubes
25
That depends: * On the size of the 3D object * On the size of the cubes
As long as the cubes are 1x1x1 then any box with an equivalent volume would hold the same number of cubes. The volume of the 3x4x10 box is 120. So a box with the dimensions 1x1x120 would work just as well as a box with the dimensions 12x10x1 or 2x5x12.
7=84 --=-- 10=x 7x=840 ---=---- 7 = 7 x = 120 x equals how many oz 10 cubes can hold
Marshmallow because it is more absorbent.
2 cubes wide x 3 cubes long x 4 cubes high. 2 X 3 X4 6 X 4 24 cubes
30
25
2x3x5 6x5 30x2 =60 cubes
72
384
It is not possible to accurately determine the exact number of sugar cubes that could fit inside a human body as it would depend on various factors such as the size of the sugar cubes and the individual's body size and density. Additionally, it is not safe or recommended to attempt to fill a human body with sugar cubes as it could lead to serious health consequences.
120 is the mass. i figured that out by mutiplying 5*8=40 then multiply that by 3. 40*3=120