306/2 = 103
203658
1666 = mdclxvi
The smallest number that can be written using three different Roman numerals is 104, which is written as "CIV" in Roman numerals.
I believe that it would be IIIV because when a smaller roman numeral goes in front of a larger one it subtracts it. IIIV mean two, and the I(1) and V(5) are the smallest roman numerals.
Assuming a seven digit whole number: 1,111,111. But if you have to use at least one (2) digit, then 1,111,112.
Under today's modern rules now governig the Roman numeral system the smallest number would be MCDXLIV = 1444 but the ancient Romans would have worked it out as DMCLXVI = 1166 - 500 = 666 and could make it even smaller by rearranging the numerals.
1666 = mdclxvi
The smallest number that can be written using three different Roman numerals is 104, which is written as "CIV" in Roman numerals.
I believe that it would be IIIV because when a smaller roman numeral goes in front of a larger one it subtracts it. IIIV mean two, and the I(1) and V(5) are the smallest roman numerals.
Assuming a seven digit whole number: 1,111,111. But if you have to use at least one (2) digit, then 1,111,112.
Assuming a seven digit whole number: 1,111,111. But if you have to use at least one (2) digit, then 1,111,112.
Assuming a seven digit whole number: 1,111,111. But if you have to use at least one (2) digit, then 1,111,112.
Under today's modern rules now governig the Roman numeral system the smallest number would be MCDXLIV = 1444 but the ancient Romans would have worked it out as DMCLXVI = 1166 - 500 = 666 and could make it even smaller by rearranging the numerals.
It is still a number.
The smallest number that someone can get using the 91764 digits is 14679. The secret is to arrange the digits from the least number to their greatest number.
The number 947 in Roman numerals would be CMXLVII
The smallest even number using this combination of digits is 2568.
MXC