150
In the opinion of another contributor:
In Roman numerals LC = 50 because LC = -50+100 = 50
But in Roman numerals CL = 150 because CL = +100+50 = 150
Answer LC is an incorrect way of writing 50, why would you write 50 less than 100 when you could simply write L (50)?
Aditional input:
The rule of subtraction isn't used, except between I's and X's. E.g, you wouldn't write IL for 49, rather this should be written as forty (XL) and nine (IX), or XLIX.
Therefore LC doesn't make sense, or is 150.
w is not assigned a value in roman numerals.
The value of MMIX in Roman numerals is 2009.
The value of CL in Roman numerals is 150.
L in Roman Numerals = 50
Do you mean in Roman numerals? If so then 67 in Roman numerals is LXVII.
w is not assigned a value in roman numerals.
The value of MMIX in Roman numerals is 2009.
The value of CL in Roman numerals is 150.
L in Roman Numerals = 50
Do you mean in Roman numerals? If so then 67 in Roman numerals is LXVII.
W has no meaning in Roman numerals, therefore VW is undefined.
Lower case Roman numerals have exactly the same value as upper case numerals
They are an invalid arrangement of Roman numerals and so therefore they have no accredited value.
It has no value because it is an invalid arrangement of Roman numerals but if you meant LXXV then it is 75
Yes
No
DXVII