Well, honey, if you're looking to estimate 2760, you could round that bad boy to 3000. It's a nice, round number that's easy on the eyes and gets the job done. Just remember, estimating is like putting on a little black dress - it doesn't have to be perfect, it just has to work.
Chat with our AI personalities
The front end estimate is 3000. But estimating a single number, in isolation and without context, is a complete waste of time. It all comes down to the context of what needs to be done with the number.
If I had to add 2760 to 1 trillion, I would estimate it as 0.
If I had to add 2760 to 0.0000000001, I would use the number as given, or possibly the front end estimate. If I had to divide it by 9, I might estimate it as 2700, because 2700/9 = 300. If I had to divide it by 70, I would estimate it as 2800, because 2800/70 = 40.
2760
The front end estimate is 300. But estimating a single number, in isolation and without context, is a complete waste of time. If I had to add 282 to 1 trillion, I would estimate it as 0. If I had to add 282 to 0.0000000001, I would use the number as given - not use an estimate.
920, 1840, 2760 and so on.
The front end estimate is 500. But estimating a single number, in isolation and without context is a complete waste of time. If I had to add 467 to 1 trillion, I would estimate it as 0. If I had to add 467 to 0.0000000001, I would use the number as given - not an estimate.
The front end estimate is 100. But estimating a single number, in isolation and without context, is a complete waste of time. If I had to add 130 to 1 trillion, I would estimate it as 0. If I had to add 130 to 0.0000000001, I would use the number as given - not use an estimate. Also, if I had to divide it by 25, I would estimate it as 125 since 125/25 = 5, whereas if I had to divide it by 12 I would estimate it as 132 because 132/12 = 11.