1330
These numbers, 610-720 nanometers are wavelengths that fall into the red end of the light spectrum. They have no direct relationship to watts which is defined as, an amount of power, especially electrical power, expressed in watts or kilowatts
The wavelength of the electromagnetic visible to the naked human eye is light. Light has wavelengths of 460 to 760 nanometers.
The longest wavelengths visible to the average human being are in the range of ~700 nanometers which appears to be red to the human eye. However, I am capable of perceiving the red light that my 2 Logitech cordless laser mice emit at 848 nanometers. I hope I am not damaging my eyesight, but I don't believe the emission spectrum for such a laser would be very wide, so I would bet that 800-820 nm is still in the visible range, at least for younger people. I am 22 years old. the longest wavelengths of visible are red colored
A nanometer is one billionth of a meter, or 0.000000001 meters. One hundred nanometers would be 0.000000100 meters.
Yes, you are still only using half the power as normal, the 7W would give you the equivalent light output and the 20W would give you more light.
The wavelength of ultraviolet light is between 10 and 400 nanometers (nm).From the wavelength you can determine the frequency. If you divide the speed of light by the wavelength, you can calculate the frequency.The frequency range would be from 7.5 x 1014 Hz to 3 x 1016 Hz.
um it would be (approximately) the same wavelength of the green light in nanometers instead of any other color wavelength it would nanometers.
The wavelength of the electromagnetic visible to the naked human eye is light. Light has wavelengths of 460 to 760 nanometers.
5.68 X 10^14? Then, speed of light = frequency * wavelength so, 2.998 X 10^8 m/s/5.68 X 10^14 s^1 = 5.278 X 10^-7 meters, or, 527.8 nanometers That would be green, I think.
0.03 micrometer
Ants are generally measured in millimeters. However, if the ant being measure is five millimeters, it would measure about five million nanometers.
Nanometers
Yes, but it would not be a sensible measurement unit.
There are 1,000,000,000 nanometers in 1 meter. To get the answer to this question one must divide 3.9 by 1 billion and the answer would look like this - 0.000000000039 m.
In visible light, this is impossible, as the molecule is smaller than the wavelength of visible light. A water molecule is 0.1515 nanometers end to end, but the highest frequency violet light is 380 nanometers. The only means of "visualizing" one is the scanning tunneling microscope, which uses measured electrical fields to determine the positions of atoms. The minimum magnification for microscope to see a water molecule would be about 1,000,000 times, but at 10,000,000 you could make out the structure.
The wavelength of light is expressed in different metric subunits derived from meters. For example, radio waves are measured in meters, visible light is measured in nanometers, and gamma rays are measured in picometers.I believe that would be the nanometer. In the past, the angstrom (= 1/10 nm) has been frequently used.
There are one million nanometers in one millimeter.A nanometer is one billionth of a meter.You would have to line up roughly 25,400,000 nanometers end-to-endin order to cover 1 inch.
The longest wavelengths visible to the average human being are in the range of ~700 nanometers which appears to be red to the human eye. However, I am capable of perceiving the red light that my 2 Logitech cordless laser mice emit at 848 nanometers. I hope I am not damaging my eyesight, but I don't believe the emission spectrum for such a laser would be very wide, so I would bet that 800-820 nm is still in the visible range, at least for younger people. I am 22 years old. the longest wavelengths of visible are red colored