XIIC
The table of Roman Numerals
M = 1000
D = 500
C = 100
L = 50
X = 10
V = 5
I = 1
The rules for composing Roman numerals is ;- Largest value to the left followed by the lesser values to the right. e.g. MDCLXVI = 1000 + 500 + 100 + 50 + 10 + 5 + 1 = 1666.
Multiples of the same value are shown as the same repeated letter.
e.g. MM = 1000 + 1000 = 2000
If a lesser value (one letter only) is shown to the left of a larger value it means subtract.
e.g.
IV = 5(V) - 1(I) = 4 or MCM = 1000 - ( 1000 - 100) = 1000 + 900 = 1900.
The current years of 2023 is MMXXIII.
Next year , 2024 is written as MMXXIV
So your question of 'XIIC' is incorrect. because you have three lesser values to the left of the greater value. ; only one symbol allowed.
The 'C' is in the wrong place. Try CXII = 100 + 10 + 1 + 1 = 112.
It is NOT read as (10 + 1 + 1 -(100) = 12 - 100 = 88.
'88' in Roman numerals is LXXXVIII.
Hope that helps!!!!
Because the positional place values of the Roman numerals II are wrong but if you meant XCII then it would be equivalent to 92
The Roman C represents 100. So the C in the question is in the wrong place. If changed to CXII it becomes 112 (one hundred and twelve) - which is correct.
I do not think that is a valid number.
LVL is not a valid roman numeral. The translation is 50/45 which makes no sense.
"Mmmmmmmmmm" is not a valid representation of a number in Roman numerals. The Roman numeral system does not have a direct representation for numbers above 3,999.
15 03 86 cannot be represented in Roman numerals as it is not a valid Roman numeral. Roman numerals do not include zero, and the numbers given do not follow the typical Roman numeral pattern.
As a Roman numeral it is equivalent to 31 which is usually expressed as XXXI
I do not think that is a valid number.
LVL is not a valid roman numeral. The translation is 50/45 which makes no sense.
"Mmmmmmmmmm" is not a valid representation of a number in Roman numerals. The Roman numeral system does not have a direct representation for numbers above 3,999.
Those are the letters used for roman numbers, but written in that order, they don't form a valid number.
15 03 86 cannot be represented in Roman numerals as it is not a valid Roman numeral. Roman numerals do not include zero, and the numbers given do not follow the typical Roman numeral pattern.
As a Roman numeral it is equivalent to 31 which is usually expressed as XXXI
It is not a valid roman numeral.
That is not a valid Roman numeral.
It is not a valid Roman numeral.
Nothing. It is not a valid Roman numeral.
VL is not a valid Roman numeral.
XXIIXII is not a valid Roman numeral.