0
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
What are the natural numbers less than 31?
The natural numbers are the counting numbers. Therefore, the natural numbers less than 31 are the numbers from 1 to 30.
What is the definition of natural numbers?
A natural counting number is a positive number greater than 0
Is 3.18 a natural number?
No because natural numbers are whole numbers greater than 0
How many more real numbers are there than natural numbers?
Since there is an infinite number of real numbers and an infinite number of natural numbers, there is not more of one kind than of another.
What set of natural numbers is less than four.?
The set of natural numbers less than four is {1, 2, 3}.
What are the natural numbers less than 31?
The natural numbers are the counting numbers. Therefore, the natural numbers less than 31 are the numbers from 1 to 30.
Can you start a sentence with rather than?
rather than procrastinate, just do it.
What is the definition of natural numbers?
A natural counting number is a positive number greater than 0
How many natural numbers are less then 10?
There are 9 natural numbers less than 10.
Is 3.18 a natural number?
No because natural numbers are whole numbers greater than 0
Are there more natural numbers than prime numbers?
Yes.
How many more real numbers are there than natural numbers?
Since there is an infinite number of real numbers and an infinite number of natural numbers, there is not more of one kind than of another.
What are the similarities of whole numbers from natural numbers?
There is some disagreement whether the set of natural numbers includes zero. Other than that, they are the same as whole numbers.
What is the converse statement for the odd natural numbers less than 8 are prime?
If odd natural numbers are less than 8, then they are prime.
What set of natural numbers is less than four.?
The set of natural numbers less than four is {1, 2, 3}.
Does the set of whole numbers is larger than the set of natural numbers?
If you mean larger by "the set of whole numbers strictly contains the set of natural numbers", then yes, but if you mean "the set of whole numbers has a larger cardinality (size) than the set of natural numbers", then no, they have the same size.
Why do scientists plot numbers rather than biomass?
.Isn't it possible that some numbers are measures of biomass? It's a little like asking "Why do people plot numbers rather than age?"
