answersLogoWhite

0

As studied in Mathematics zero is always taken as a whole numbers .So,the natural numbers begin from 0+1=1 .Hence, the next number is 1.

User Avatar

Wiki User

10y ago

What else can I help you with?

Related Questions

Are there even natural numbers greater than 9?

Yes, there are infinitely many natural numbers greater than 9. Natural numbers start from 1 and continue indefinitely, so numbers like 10, 11, 12, and so on, all qualify as natural numbers greater than 9. The set of natural numbers is unbounded, meaning there is no largest natural number.


What are the natural numbers less than 31?

The natural numbers are the counting numbers. Therefore, the natural numbers less than 31 are the numbers from 1 to 30.


Can you start a sentence with rather than?

rather than procrastinate, just do it.


What is set of natural numbers less than 3?

The set of natural numbers less than 3 includes the numbers 1 and 2. Natural numbers are positive integers starting from 1, so any number less than 3 within this set would be 1 or 2. This set does not include the number 3 itself since natural numbers start from 1 and do not include 0 or negative numbers.


What is the definition of natural numbers?

A natural counting number is a positive number greater than 0


Is 3.18 a natural number?

No because natural numbers are whole numbers greater than 0


How many natural numbers are less then 10?

There are 9 natural numbers less than 10.


Are there more natural numbers than prime numbers?

Yes.


How many more real numbers are there than natural numbers?

Since there is an infinite number of real numbers and an infinite number of natural numbers, there is not more of one kind than of another.


What are the similarities of whole numbers from natural numbers?

There is some disagreement whether the set of natural numbers includes zero. Other than that, they are the same as whole numbers.


What set of natural numbers is less than four.?

The set of natural numbers less than four is {1, 2, 3}.


Does the set of whole numbers is larger than the set of natural numbers?

If you mean larger by "the set of whole numbers strictly contains the set of natural numbers", then yes, but if you mean "the set of whole numbers has a larger cardinality (size) than the set of natural numbers", then no, they have the same size.