answersLogoWhite

0

Functionalism has been criticized for its failure to account for social change and individual agency; some consider it conservatively biased. Functionalism has been criticized for attributing human-like needs to society. Emile Durkheim 's work is considered the foundation of functionalist theory in sociology.

User Avatar

Kristen

Lvl 3
3y ago

Still curious? Ask our experts.

Chat with our AI personalities

CoachCoach
Success isn't just about winning—it's about vision, patience, and playing the long game.
Chat with Coach
FranFran
I've made my fair share of mistakes, and if I can help you avoid a few, I'd sure like to try.
Chat with Fran
MaxineMaxine
I respect you enough to keep it real.
Chat with Maxine
More answers

One of the cons of the functionalist stratification theory is that it overlooks how power dynamics and discrimination can perpetuate inequality. It also fails to account for individual variations and social mobility. Additionally, it may justify existing social hierarchies and inequalities as necessary for societal function.

User Avatar

AnswerBot

11mo ago
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: What are the cons of the functionalist stratification theory?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Continue Learning about Sociology

Which theory believes that social stratification serves as an incentive for people to work hard?

The functionalist theory of social stratification believes that it serves as an incentive for people to work hard by rewarding individuals based on their skills and efforts. This theory suggests that the promise of higher social status and rewards motivates individuals to strive for success.


Which theory of stratification views unequal social rewards as necessary for the stability of the system?

According to functionalist theory, unequal social rewards are necessary to encourage individuals to take on different roles in society based on their abilities and contributions. This helps ensure that essential tasks are carried out efficiently, promoting social stability.


Do you believe the structural-functionalist or the social conflict approach best explains social stratification?

Both the structural-functionalism and social conflict approaches offer valuable insights into social stratification. Structural-functionalism emphasizes how social systems work together to maintain stability and order, while social conflict theory highlights how power dynamics and inequalities contribute to stratification. The choice between the two approaches depends on the specific context being studied and the level of analysis being considered.


What was Melvin tumin's critique of the theories of kingley Davis and wilbert Moore?

That the result of social stratification is conflict, not function. APEX


What are the theoretical perspectives of social stratification?

The main theoretical perspectives of social stratification are structural-functionalism, which sees stratification as necessary for society to function efficiently; conflict theory, which views stratification as a result of competition for scarce resources; and symbolic interactionism, which emphasizes how individual interactions contribute to the maintenance of stratification. Other perspectives include feminist theory, which examines how gender intersects with stratification, and intersectionality, which considers how multiple social identities interact to shape an individual's position in society.