The diagonals of a square are always perpendicular.
No, not necessarily. It would have to also be a square or a kite in order to have perpendicular diagonals.
Rhombus and Square (since a square is just a "special" rhombus, with right angles)
You could draw in the two diagonals (from corner to opposite corner). You could draw two perpendicular lines to develop four squares inside the existing square. You could draw three parallel lines to develop four equally-sized rectangles within the square.
If the parallelogram happens to also be a rhombus (i.e. has all sides equal in length) then yes, otherwise no.
The diagonals of a square are always perpendicular.
The diagonals of a rectangle are never perpendicular but the diagonals of a square are perpendicular
Sure, a square is a rectangle and the diagonals of a square are perpendicular.
The diagonals of a square are perpendicular whereas the diagonals of a rectangle are not perpendicular.
The diagonals of a square are perpendicular whereas the diagonals of a rectangle are not perpendicular.
No. The diagonals of a rhombus are perpendicular only if the rhombus is a square.
No but the diagonals of a square, rhombus and a kite are perpendicular to each other
No, not necessarily. It would have to also be a square or a kite in order to have perpendicular diagonals.
Yes
square
No.
No but the diagonals of a square intersect at right angles