discrete data
Yes it can assume countable number of outcomes.
It is called grouping data.
Not very good for a large number of categories. Not good for comparing two (or more) variables, especially if one is not consistently bigger than the other. Very poor for comparing a large number of variables.
Categorical data (or variable) consists of names representing categories. For example, the gender (categories of male & female) of the people where you work or go to school; or the make of cars in the parking lot (categories of Ford, GM, Toyota, Mazda, KIA, etc) is categorical data. Numerical data (or variable) consists of numbers that represent counts or measurements. For example, the number of males & females where you work or go to school; or the number of the make of cars Ford, GM, Toyota, Mazda, KIA, etc is numerical data.
thrillion
continuous data
countable
Yes it can assume countable number of outcomes.
27
Yes, they can be put into a one-to-one correspondence. The size of both sets is what's called a "countable infinity".
It is countable because the singular or plural can be preceded by a number (one river, three rivers).
An adverbial number is a word which expresses a countable number of times, such as "twice".
It is called grouping data.
Hotels are classified using a range of categories. They include such things as size, location, target market, levels of service, facilities, and number of rooms.
Even though there are different special numbers, there is only one special number that falls under all the categories. The number one is special because it cannot be a prime or a composite number as one only has one factor: itself. So it is classified as a special number. There are, however, other special numbers in separate categories.
No, the word 'scenery' is an uncountable noun, a type of noun called an aggregate noun, a word representing an indefinite number of elements or parts.
No, it is uncountable. The set of real numbers is uncountable and the set of rational numbers is countable, since the set of real numbers is simply the union of both, it follows that the set of irrational numbers must also be uncountable. (The union of two countable sets is countable.)