F
H
3
2
4
Yes, this is true
F
H
h
Field studies are conducted in real-world settings, while lab studies are conducted in controlled environments. Field studies tend to have more external validity as they reflect real-world conditions, whereas lab studies offer more control over variables. Field studies may be more challenging to control for extraneous factors compared to lab studies.
There are an endless array of both internal and external factors that can have either a positive or negative affect on business operations. External factors would include changes in the economy, government regulation, war, weather (i.e. hurricanes, flooding, etc.), competition and market changes, among others. Usually external factors are beyond the control of management.
Researchers control for factors that could influence a dependent variable by using various methods such as randomization, matching, statistical analysis, and experimental design. They may also use control groups, blinding techniques, and stratification to minimize the impact of extraneous variables on the dependent variable. By carefully designing and conducting experiments, researchers can isolate the effects of the independent variable on the dependent variable.
M. F. O'Reilly has written: 'The influence of extraneous factors on displacement perimetry thresholds'
Trur
Not necessarily. When considering whether or not to close a school, standardized tests should be balanced with other factors, like how well students are doing overall.
In a control group, factors are consistant- the factors do not change
It is the "CONTROL". Think control group...