Think you've got this backwards. The exponential probability distribution is a gamma probability distribution only when the first parameter, k is set to 1. Consistent with the link below, if random variable X is distributed gamma(k,theta), then for gamma(1, theta), the random variable is distributed exponentially.
The gamma function in the denominator is equal to 1 when k=1. The denominator will reduce to theta when k = 1. The first term will be X0 = 1.
using t to represent theta, we have
f(x,t) = 1/t*exp(-x/t)
or we can substitute L = 1/t, and write an equivalent function:
f(x;L) = L*exp(-L*x) for x > 0
See:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gamma_distribution
[edit]
To the untrained eye the question might seem backwards after a quick Google search, yet qouting wikipedia lacks deeper insight in to the question: What the question is referring to is a class of functions that factor into the following form:
f(y;theta) = s(y)t(theta)exp[a(y)b(theta)] = exp[a(y)b(theta) + c(theta) + d(y)]
where a(y), d(y) are functions only reliant on y and where b(theta) and c(theta) are answers only reliant on theta, an unkown parameter.
if a(y) = y, the distribution is said to be in "canonical form" and b(theta) is often called the "natural parameter"
So taking the gamma density function, where alpha is a known shape parameter and the parameter of interest is beta, the scale parameter. The density function follows as:
f(y;beta) = {(beta^alpha)*[y^(alpha - 1)]*exp[-y*beta]}/gamma(alpha)
where gamma(alpha) is defined as (alpha - 1)!
Hence the gamma-density can be factored as follows:
f(y;beta) = {(beta^alpha)*[y^(alpha - 1)]*exp[-y*beta]}/gamma(alpha)
=exp[alpha*log(beta) + (alpha-1)*log(y) - y*beta - log[gamma(alpha)]
from the above expression, the canonical form follows if:
a(y) = y
b(theta) = -beta
c(theta) = alpha*log(beta)
d(y) = (alpha - 1)*log(y) - log[gamma(alpha)]
which is sufficient to prove that gamma distributions are part of the exponential family.
To prove the hypothesis. To disprove the hypothesis.
does not prove
you dont silly :)
A strong positive correlation does not prove causation. People only get sunburned during daylight hours. Sundials only work during daylight hours. Therefore sundials cause sunburns. The above sentences show how absurd such predicate thinking could be. Simply because two events usually occur at the same time does not mean they are related. One man found a perfect correlation between the price of whiskey and Chicago school teachers' salaries. No possible relationship could possibly exist except the rate of prosperity and inflation. Causation is difficult to prove.
Branch and bound method is used for optimisation problems. It can prove helpful when greedy approach and dynamic programming fails. Also Branch and Bound method allows backtracking while greedy and dynamic approaches doesnot.However it is a slower method.
Logistics growth as exponential only uses scientific examples to prove a study
DNA test.
Applying a method of analytical chemistry to this solution; also testing with a gamma rays radiometer.
one has to prove the nucleus of joint family and creation of properties during jointness of hindu family
only the members can in prove the answers because when you click on in prove answer the log on thing comes on.
You shouldn't have to PROVE that you're gay. If you are romantically or sexually attracted to members of the opposite sex, then you are gay.
From the beginning of your life, we are expected to prove ourselves in order to gain respect. Respecting your family is a key ingredient for a healthy relationship between family members. You should love your family because they love you. Don't wait for them to fade away before respecting them.
It is possible to be gluten intolerant at any point in your life without it being traced down through your family. But 97% of all cases, prove that the a preceding family members had genes that passed down gluten intolerance.
It can be, it depends were your family is from and if you can prove that they were Jewish
If I'm reading this right, your family is 'dumb', and you want to be adopted into another family. Go to Family Court, and prove that your family cannot care for you.
In chapter 30 of "The Swiss Family Robinson," the Arabs prove to be kind and hospitable when they rescue the family from the shipwreck and offer them assistance. They provide the Robinson family with food, shelter, and guidance, showing compassion and generosity towards strangers in need.
That she can run the family ranch