7
A negative correlation.
Yes, just by changing the distance between data points you can make a trend seem to accelerate rapidly and steeply, or do the opposite and hide that information.
A trend is a certain direction which something is changing. A pattern is where a repeat of a series or trend is seen over and over.
It all depends on what the trend is doing... is it going up, down, or horizontal? If up, it's an up trend If down, it's a down trend If horizontal, it's in a trading range.
trend is the increasing or decreasing in a line graph Example. If u choose to see number of students in a school and they are getting bigger its trend is increasing
The amount an individual point departs from the trend line is the important feature, not that the number above and below should be balanced. A point that is much further away from the trend line is less likely to represent the process being plotted. Each point is of course quite real, but each are influenced by measurement error, random processes within the experiment, recording (transcription) error, and so on. If most of your points lie on a smooth curve, it is more likely that an outlier is subject to error.
The line of a graph is quite often used to indicate the average of various data points that fall both above and below the line. Very jagged lines get smoothed out, but the trend is the same.
The trend of boiling points across a period in the periodic table should decrease from metals to nonmetals. The trend becomes more complicated between metals, the boiling point of metals tends to increase across a period.
The direction in which the trend analysis points.
Its when the datas points are going upwards or downwards
It is the description of a slope of a line which connects from many points you mark to show a way that your graph data may increase or decrease. If it is decreasing, you have a downwards trend. If it is increasing, you have an upwards trend.
You look at trends. An element is likely to have properties somewhere between the element above it and the element below it; if there's nothing below it (or above it), then you can follow the general trend up (or down) that column and extrapolate.
The melting point is greater.
decreasing
Why not? Or, in other words, there's not really a "why" to explain here; it's an extension of a well-established trend (unlike mercury, which is a liquid at room temperature while all the metals around it are solid and there's no such trend that would predict its dramatically lower melting point). The trend for alkali metals is that they have lower melting points as you move down the table. By the time you get to caesium, it's only a little above room temperature, and the theoretical melting point for francium is even lower than that (but still slightly above room temperature).
The data points were inconsistent and therefore no specific trend could be noted.
Its called a trend.