Yes. A large vocabulary is indicative of high intelligence. This is not to say that a large vocabulary increases your intelligence; rather, it's to say that a high intelligence is what enables you to acquire a large vocabulary. Hence the correlation between vocabulary and IQ.
Some people try to artificially inflate their IQs by memorizing lists of esoteric words; however, this has very little, if any, positive effect on increasing their intelligence. As you acquire more and more words, the differences in word meanings become more and more subtle (e.g. connive and collude, although similar, have a shade of difference in their meanings); the ability to distinguish between shades of meaning in words requires a keen intellect.
People who try to artificially expand their vocabulary size end up misusing the words they've memorized because they simply lack the intelligence to grasp the subtelties of language.
No
Correlation coefficient
A serious error. The maximum magnitude for a correlation coefficient is 1.The Correlation coefficient is lies between -1 to 1 if it is 0 mean there is no correlation between them. Here they are given less than -1 value so it is not a value of correlation coefficient.
Why the value of correlation coefficient is always between -1 and 1?
why correlation cofficient always lies between 1 and -1
No
There is a positive correlation between scoring 85 on the ASVAB test and one's IQ level, indicating that individuals who score higher on the ASVAB test tend to have higher IQ levels.
There is a positive correlation between scoring an 86 on the ASVAB test and one's IQ level, indicating that individuals with higher IQ levels are more likely to score higher on the ASVAB test.
IQ has no correlation with ethnic groups.
There isn't any correlation between gathering wealth and IQ. Many factors are involved on becoming rich and keeping themselves rich. If it was true, IQ and wealth involved, rich men would not lose their wealth never. Desire of success and power leads many persons with a medium IQ to become rich.
Whether a person likes cats or dogs better is a matter of personality, not IQ.
Research has shown a moderate correlation between ASVAB scores and IQ, with individuals scoring 85 on the ASVAB test typically having an IQ around 85-90. This suggests that there is a relationship between cognitive abilities measured by both tests, but they are not perfectly aligned.
There is no definitive correlation between IQ and political party affiliation. Political beliefs are influenced by a complex interplay of factors beyond intelligence, such as socioeconomic status, culture, and personal experiences. Studies exploring this topic have produced mixed results, and it is important to consider the limitations of drawing direct links between IQ and political party preferences.
There is no direct correlation between solving a Rubik's Cube and one's IQ level. While some people may find solving the cube easier with higher IQ levels, it is not a definitive measure of intelligence. IQ is a complex and multifaceted concept that cannot be accurately determined by a single task like solving a Rubik's Cube.
Research suggests that there is no direct correlation between aphantasia (the inability to visualize mental images) and IQ. Aphantasia does not necessarily indicate higher or lower intelligence levels. IQ is a measure of cognitive abilities, while aphantasia is a variation in mental imagery processing.
There is no direct correlation between solving a Rubik's Cube and IQ. IQ is a measure of cognitive abilities across various domains, while solving a Rubik's Cube is a specific skill that can be learned through practice and strategy.
The ACT score and IQ test measure different aspects of cognitive ability and academic skills, making direct conversion between them inaccurate. While some studies suggest a correlation between standardized test scores and IQ, the relationship is not consistent across different populations. Therefore, it is not possible to reliably convert an ACT score into an IQ score.