0
- Allow complete information on the subject’s exposure, including quality control of data, and experience thereafter.
- Provide a clear temporal sequence of exposure and disease.
- Give an opportunity to study multiple outcomes related to a specific exposure.
- Permit calculation of incidence rates (absolute risk) as well as relative risk.
- Methodology and results are easily understood by non-epidemiologists.
- Enable the study of relatively rare exposures.
What else can I help you with?
Is a cohort study qualitative or quantitative?
Quantitative
What is the difference between justification and significance?
advantages of the study
Advantages and dis advantages of sampling?
There are many advantages and disadvantages of sampling. These advantages include being able to try what you need before you buy.
Advantages of multistage sampling?
Advantages of multistage sampling?
What are advantages of tabulation?
it is easy
What is a concurrent cohort study?
it is prospective cohort study
Is cohort study primary or secondary literature?
A cohort study is considered primary literature because it involves original research conducted by the authors.
Is a cohort study qualitative or quantitative?
Quantitative
In a cohort study a scientist collects health data on a group of nurses. What characteristics was used to form the cohort?
Occupation
In a cohort study, a scientist collects health data on a group of drug abusers. What characteristic was used to form the cohort?
behavior
In a cohort study, a scientists collects health data on a group of people born in 1976. What characteristic was used to form the cohort?
Age.
What is the difference between a panel study and a cohort study?
A panel study involves repeatedly collecting data from the same individuals over time to study changes within the same group. A cohort study follows a group of individuals who share a common characteristic or experience over time to see how their outcomes differ. The key difference is that in a panel study, the same individuals are followed over time, while in a cohort study, different individuals may be added to the study group over time.
In a cohort study a scientist collects health date on a group of drug abusers what characteristic was used to form the cohort?
The characteristic used to form the cohort in this study is drug abuse. The scientist is collecting health data on individuals who share this common characteristic of being drug abusers.
In a cohort study a scientist collects healthy data on a group of drugs abusers what characteristics was used to form the cohort?
The characteristic used to form the cohort in this study would be drug abuse. The cohort would consist of individuals who are drug abusers, and the scientist would collect data on their health outcomes over time to investigate relationships between drug abuse and health.
In a cohort study a scientist collects health data on a group of people born in 1976. What characteristic was used to form the cohort?
The cohort in this study was formed based on the shared characteristic of being born in 1976. This characteristic allows the scientist to follow this group of individuals over time to observe their health outcomes.
In a cohort study a scientist collects health data on a group of drug abusers. What characteristic was used to form the cohort?
Age
Is meta-analysis better than cohort study?
Meta-analysis is not inherently "better" than a cohort study; rather, they serve different purposes. Meta-analysis combines the results of multiple studies to provide a more comprehensive overview of a topic, while a cohort study follows a group of individuals over time to examine the effects of certain exposures. Both study designs have their own strengths and limitations, and their appropriateness depends on the research question being addressed.
