Discovering a hypothesis that is not true can be as valuable as finding out that it is true. If the hypothesis is not supported, scientists may repeat the investigation to check for mistakes. Or they may look at the original question in a new way, ask new questions, and form new hypotheses. New questions and hypotheses can lead to new investigations and discoveries.
=^-^= Thank you for reading. I hope this helps you. (:
Change or abandon your hypothesis.
If a researcher fails to reject the null hypothesis when it is actually false, they have made a Type II error. This occurs when the researcher incorrectly concludes that there is not enough evidence to support an alternative hypothesis, despite it being true. In contrast, a Type I error happens when the null hypothesis is rejected when it is actually true.
with the alternative hypothesis the reasearcher is predicting
Be able to reject the null hypothesis and accept the research hypothesis
H0 is the null hypothesis and h1 is the alternative hypothesis
An unsupported hypothesis is a statement that proposes a possible explanation for something but lacks evidence or data to back it up. It is typically not based on any empirical research or logical reasoning, making it unreliable and unproven.
No because a hypothesis s an educated guess..It doesn't need supporting details only you final conclusion needs evidence
No. You can use your experimental observations or do more research to formulate a new hypothesis. A hypothesis that is not supported by the experimental data, it is just simply an unsupported hypothesis.
B. A hypothesis can never be proven. It can be supported, unsupported, or partially supported by the experimental evidence. The experimental data resulting from a tested hypothesis can be used to formulate a new hypothesis.
An unsupported hypothesis is a proposed explanation or prediction that lacks sufficient evidence or empirical data to validate it. It may arise from observations or preliminary ideas but has not been rigorously tested or confirmed through experimentation or research. As a result, it remains speculative and cannot be accepted as a reliable conclusion until further evidence is provided.
Results from an investigation can either support or contradict a hypothesis based on the evidence gathered. When the findings align with the initial predictions, they provide support, indicating that the hypothesis may be valid. Conversely, if the results are inconsistent with the hypothesis, they suggest that it may be unsupported or require reevaluation. Ultimately, the interpretation of results helps inform future research directions and understanding of the studied phenomenon.
Then it's time for a new hypothesis.
Change or abandon your hypothesis.
Simply put, because there is not enough evidence to support it. "Rejected by scientists" should not be taken to always mean "scientist believe it is impossible" - rather, consistent evidence that support the hypothesis has not been produced.
the Hypothesis would probably be also wrong but its okay because a hypothesis is a educated guess
A hypothesis is only a guess, it doesn't matter if i cant be proven
an explanation of how or why something happens is called a hypothesis.