To reject null hypothesis, because there is a very low probability (below the significance level) that the observed values would have been observed if the hypothesis were true.
It is when you know that your hypothesis is wrong.
yes
The significance test is the process used, by researchers, to determine whether the null hypothesis is rejected, in favor of the alternative research hypothesis, or not.
Yes.
It means that, if the null hypothesis is true, there is still a 1% chance that the outcome is so extreme that the null hypothesis is rejected.
the reason why a rejected hypothesis can still be of value to a scientist is because that secific hyothesis may not work for your experiment but it could work for a different experiment/theory
It is when you know that your hypothesis is wrong.
A rejected hypothesis could be helpful to a scientist because it helps them create a theory by process of elimination.
A hypothesis will be rejected if it fails the necessary testing required for it to become a scientific theory.
He could not explain how or why the continents moved.
Because Alfred Wegener couldn't specify the mechanism responsible for the movement of the continents, the continental drift hypothesis was rejected. This theory is now accepted science.
The answer to the question why is this: It can be rejected at a later date because it is falsifiable in nature if it is a good hypothesis. If you meant to ask HOW it can be rejected, the answer is by way of further experimentation that rules out some or all of the hypothesis as stated.
Scientist rejected Wegners hypothesis of continental drift at first because he did not have enogh evidence to support his theory. He failed to provide a suitable mechanism that could cause the continents to move.
The hypothesis test.
no. you need to have solid proof that it exist.. else it will be rejected.
If a hypothesis does not explain an observation, it is rejected. A hypothesis is basically just an educated guess, so it could be wrong, or right.
yes