2
in 2000 the average was 2.1 so I would say somewhere around there
There are few, if any, families living in the Vatican. Most employees having families live in the city of Rome.
Nope. Just having a Mom, Dad and children does not guarantee a healthy family, and there are healthy families that may be missing one of the three.
There are a lot of reasons why family or families are broken but the most common reason is neither one of the couple being unfaithful to their partner, compromising the lives of their children.
totally and absolutely, sometimes they have to adapt and change as children leave home, but family values are tied up in traditions and can be an integral part of families for generations.
Some children in extended families do well with that arrangement while others do less well. It depends on which extended family you are, f the relatives are bad, annoying, cruel you feel unhappy, but if they are good you feel good, happy, trusted. It is much they same with children living in isolated nuclear families.
You don't get rid of them, they just use medicines, condoms, surguries, etc. to prevent having extra ones. If that failed then the family have to pay fines.
Urban families tended to be smaller than rural families due to factors such as higher cost of living in cities, limited living space, and greater access to family planning services. Additionally, urban families may prioritize career and professional development over having a large number of children.
It really depends on where you are talking as well as when. Families in rural areas like Stratford tended to be larger than in cities, due both to higher fertility and lower mortality. Diet may have been one factor as well as the presence of communicable diseases in cities. In any case, there was a general population growth throughout the 1500s in England, suggesting an average family size of between 4 and 5. In the 1600s family sizes reduced, partly because of a movement of population to cities and partly due to failed harvests. The population of England throughout the seventeenth century leveled out, suggesting an average family size of 4 during this period. An examination of Shakespeare's own family is illuminating. Shakespeare was one of eight children, only two of whom went on to have a family of any kind. Shakespeare was one of these, having three children, only two of whom survived to adulthood. Susanna had one child and Judith two, and Shakespeare had no great-grandchildren. William's sister Joan had four children, only one of whom went on to have a family of his own. Of his four children, only one went on to have a family. Thus John and Mary Shakespeare had only one great-grandchild who went on to have a family, notwithstanding having had eight children of their own.
one or 2 children in a family having a close relationship with grandparents
No. Many families who have a lot of children often have several children share the same room.
Two common types of family units are the extended and the nuclear family.