True. It is because that is how prime numbers are defined. If 1 or negative integers were included in the definition then The Fundamental Theorem of Arithmetic* would fail. That would have serious consequences for many other theorems.
In simple terms, The Fundamental Theorem of Arithmetic states that for any positive integer greater than 1, there is only one prime factorisation if you disregard the order in which the factors are written.,
True
Yes, a prime number is always greater than 1.
false sometimes it contains 2 primes it always comes out to a prime number
False. An enormous number of them are divisible by three.
Yes.
Yes.
True
They aren't. The square roots of prime numbers are always irrational.
True. Hallelujah!!!!! I'm correctomundo
False because 1 is not a prime or a composite number and the smallest odd prime number is 3
False because 1 is not a prime or a composite number and the smallest odd Prime number is 3
53 is a prime number that is greater than 50