answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

H2O, with a bond angle of 104.5 degrees due to its three areas of electron density.

User Avatar

Wiki User

12y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: According to VSEPR theory which molecule has a bent shape CO2 H2O CS2 HF?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

What does the VSEPR theory tell about a molecule?

A. The geometry it will have


The VSEPR theory allows us to determine the?

The VSEPR theory allows us to determine the molecular geometry of a molecule based on the number of electron pairs around the central atom. It helps predict the shape of molecules by minimizing electron pair repulsion. This theory is useful in understanding the spatial arrangement of atoms in molecules and their properties.


Use VSEPR theory to predict the shape of the carbon tetraiodide molecule CI4?

Tetrahedral.


What VSEPR shape does SiCl4 have?

SiCl2Br2 would take a tetrahedral shape according to the VSEPR theory.


Why is the VSEPR theory not needed to predict the shape of HCl?

Because two atomic centres can only create a linear molecule.


What is the vsepr shape of THC?

THC is a large molecule containing many aromatic rings. It does not have a common VSEPR shape, but it mostly sits in the same plane.


What is the molecular shape for Br2 in VSEPR theory?

It has a linear shape


What in VSEPR theory?

VSEPR stands for Valence Shell Electron Pair Repulsion, and it describes how valence (bonding) electrons are arranged around an atom, and how they are used in creating a bond. This then can be used to help predict the GEOMETRIC SHAPE of the molecule being formed.


What is the molecular shape of ClO3F as predicted by the VSEPR theory?

ClO3F would be tetrahedral.


What are the drawbacks of VSEPR theory?

The VSEPR theory is simple yet powerful. Nevertheless, like any simplified model, it has its limitations. First, although it predicts that the bond angle in H2O is less than the tetrahedral angle, it does not make any attempt to predict the magnitude of the decrease. Second, the theory makes no predictions about the lengths of the bonds, which is another aspect of the shape of a molecule. Third, it ascribes the entire criterion of shape to electrostatic repulsions between bonding pairs, when in fact there are numerous contributions to the total energy of a molecule, and electrostatic effects are not necessarily the dominant ones. Fourth, the theory relies on some vague concepts, such as the difference in repelling effects of lone pairs and bonding pairs. There also are some species for which VSEPR theory fails. Nevertheless, despite these limitations and uncertainties, VSEPR theory is a useful rule of thumb and can be used with reasonable confidence for numerous species.l


What is the shape of H'M according to the VSEPR theory?

I don't know what "H'M" is supposed to be, so the question cannot be answered. Any binary compound is linear, because there's no other option; one doesn't really need VSEPR to predict that.


What is the molecular shape of SCl3F as predicted by the VSEPR theory?

I believe it would be a T-shaped molecule because it has 3 bonding pairs and 2 lone pairs.