H2O, with a bond angle of 104.5 degrees due to its three areas of electron density.
ClO3F would be tetrahedral.
In terms of struture, lone pairs contribute helping a molecule acquire a shape as dictated by VSEPR Theory (Valence Shell Electron Pair Repulsion Theory). Regarding chemical properties lone pair/s of electrons can make a molecule act as a Lewis base (like ammonia) in the reaction mixtures the extent of which depends on various other features in the structure of molecule.
Repulsion of the unshared electron pairs (2)and the bonded pairs (2) around the central oxygen atom. Repulsion of these 4 electron pairs attempts to form a tetrahedral shape. Describing the molecular shape, we ignore the unshared electrons and just describe the shape of the molecule based on the location of the atoms, thus bent.
Ax5
AX3
A. The geometry it will have
The VSEPR theory allows us to determine the molecular geometry of a molecule based on the number of electron pairs around the central atom. It helps predict the shape of molecules by minimizing electron pair repulsion. This theory is useful in understanding the spatial arrangement of atoms in molecules and their properties.
Tetrahedral.
SiCl2Br2 would take a tetrahedral shape according to the VSEPR theory.
Because two atomic centres can only create a linear molecule.
THC is a large molecule containing many aromatic rings. It does not have a common VSEPR shape, but it mostly sits in the same plane.
It has a linear shape
VSEPR stands for Valence Shell Electron Pair Repulsion, and it describes how valence (bonding) electrons are arranged around an atom, and how they are used in creating a bond. This then can be used to help predict the GEOMETRIC SHAPE of the molecule being formed.
ClO3F would be tetrahedral.
The VSEPR theory is simple yet powerful. Nevertheless, like any simplified model, it has its limitations. First, although it predicts that the bond angle in H2O is less than the tetrahedral angle, it does not make any attempt to predict the magnitude of the decrease. Second, the theory makes no predictions about the lengths of the bonds, which is another aspect of the shape of a molecule. Third, it ascribes the entire criterion of shape to electrostatic repulsions between bonding pairs, when in fact there are numerous contributions to the total energy of a molecule, and electrostatic effects are not necessarily the dominant ones. Fourth, the theory relies on some vague concepts, such as the difference in repelling effects of lone pairs and bonding pairs. There also are some species for which VSEPR theory fails. Nevertheless, despite these limitations and uncertainties, VSEPR theory is a useful rule of thumb and can be used with reasonable confidence for numerous species.l
I don't know what "H'M" is supposed to be, so the question cannot be answered. Any binary compound is linear, because there's no other option; one doesn't really need VSEPR to predict that.
I believe it would be a T-shaped molecule because it has 3 bonding pairs and 2 lone pairs.