By all definitions for numbers
I would suggest that all integer numbers should be considered primes since their divisions are absolutely limited. I would categorize numbers in being single factor or multiple factor.
Absolutely not. A square number has an integer square root, so by definition it has at least one factor. Prime numbers have no factors
No. Rational numbers are numbers that can be written as fractions, while integers are numbers without decimal places. Rational numbers include, but are not limited to, integers. For instance, 1.7 is rational but it's not an integer.
An integer is a datatype which represents every positive and negative natural number. Additionally it can represent zero, but no decimal numbers. However, the actual size of the integer my be limited by the operating system.
The two main divisions are rational numbers and irrational numbers.
Integer are whole numbers. As 63.46 is not a whole number, it is not an integer.
Yes. "Integer" includes positive numbers, negative numbers, and zero.
non integer rational numbers means the numbers in p/q form and this value is not a perfect integer. ex: 22/7
71 is, itself an integer but to find a difference you require 3 numbers.71 is, itself an integer but to find a difference you require 3 numbers.71 is, itself an integer but to find a difference you require 3 numbers.71 is, itself an integer but to find a difference you require 3 numbers.
Integer numbers : ...-5,-4,-3,-2,-1,0,1,2,3,4,5... Float numbers 1.25, 1.26 etc They are float numbers because its value can be altered after the point, which is based on an integer number.
Integer numbers are a subset of real numbers. Real numbers may contain fractions.
Not at all. Six times one half is three, and one half is not an integer.
no, all negative numbers are smaller than positive numbers