Yes, they are relatively prime.
Yes 34 and 39 are relatively prime.........i think so dont trust this answer!:)
Yes, 16 and 39 are relatively prime. This is because the only greatest common factor they have is 1 that means these two numbers are relatively prime.
39 and 45 are not relatively prime because they have 3 as a common factor. Relatively prime numbers have no common factor greater than 1.
All not prime
No. hcf(39, 182) = 13. Their highest common factor would be 1 if they were relatively prime.
No, 13 and 39 are not relatively prime. 13 is a factor of 39.
41 is relatively prime.
Yes 34 and 39 are relatively prime.........i think so dont trust this answer!:)
Yes, 16 and 39 are relatively prime. This is because the only greatest common factor they have is 1 that means these two numbers are relatively prime.
39 and 45 are not relatively prime because they have 3 as a common factor. Relatively prime numbers have no common factor greater than 1.
Yes, 13 and 17 are relatively prime.
All not prime
No. hcf(39, 182) = 13. Their highest common factor would be 1 if they were relatively prime.
17 and 68 are not relatively prime because they have 17 as a common factor.
Yes, they are relatively prime.
To be relatively prime requires another number, and the highest common factor between 17 and that number must be 1. 17 is relatively prime to all numbers which are not multiples of 17 (since 17 is a prime number).
17, 23 and 31 are prime. 39 is not.