No, 13 and 39 are not relatively prime. 13 is a factor of 39.
Two numbers are considered relatively prime if they share no common factors other than 1. In this case, 26 and 39 are not relatively prime because they have a common factor of 13 (13 is a factor of both 26 and 39). Therefore, 26 and 39 are not relatively prime.
The prime factors of 39 are 3 and 13.
13 and 3The prime numbers (factors) of 39 are: 3 and 13
Since 13 is a prime number (i.e., 13 is the only factor of 13), any number that is not a multiple of 13 is relatively prime to it.
The prime numbers (factors) of 39 are: 3 and 13
Two numbers are considered relatively prime if they share no common factors other than 1. In this case, 26 and 39 are not relatively prime because they have a common factor of 13 (13 is a factor of both 26 and 39). Therefore, 26 and 39 are not relatively prime.
No. hcf(39, 182) = 13. Their highest common factor would be 1 if they were relatively prime.
21 = 3 x 7 39 = 3 x 13 So 21 and 39 are not relatively prime as they are sharing a common factor: 3
Yes, they are relatively prime.
41 is relatively prime.
Yes 34 and 39 are relatively prime.........i think so dont trust this answer!:)
39 and 45 are not relatively prime because they have 3 as a common factor. Relatively prime numbers have no common factor greater than 1.
Yes, 16 and 39 are relatively prime. This is because the only greatest common factor they have is 1 that means these two numbers are relatively prime.
All not prime
As 13 is prime and is not a factor of 24, then they are relatively prime
13 and 4 are relatively prime.
13 and 24 are relatively prime.