answersLogoWhite

0

Yes, they are relatively prime.

User Avatar

Wiki User

9y ago

What else can I help you with?

Related Questions

Are 13 and 39 relatively prime?

No, 13 and 39 are not relatively prime. 13 is a factor of 39.


What number is relatively prime to forty?

41 is relatively prime.


Is 34 and 39 relatively prime?

Yes 34 and 39 are relatively prime.........i think so dont trust this answer!:)


Are 16 and 39 relatively prime?

Yes, 16 and 39 are relatively prime. This is because the only greatest common factor they have is 1 that means these two numbers are relatively prime.


Are 39 and 45 relatively prime?

39 and 45 are not relatively prime because they have 3 as a common factor. Relatively prime numbers have no common factor greater than 1.


Are 13 and 17 relatively prime?

Yes, 13 and 17 are relatively prime.


Is 16 and 39 relatively prime?

All not prime


Are 39 and 182 relatively prime?

No. hcf(39, 182) = 13. Their highest common factor would be 1 if they were relatively prime.


Are 17 and 68 relatively prime?

17 and 68 are not relatively prime because they have 17 as a common factor.


Are 26 and 39 relatively prime?

Two numbers are considered relatively prime if they share no common factors other than 1. In this case, 26 and 39 are not relatively prime because they have a common factor of 13 (13 is a factor of both 26 and 39). Therefore, 26 and 39 are not relatively prime.


Why is 17 relatively prime with 21?

Yes, they are relatively prime.


Is 17 relatively prime?

To be relatively prime requires another number, and the highest common factor between 17 and that number must be 1. 17 is relatively prime to all numbers which are not multiples of 17 (since 17 is a prime number).