Yes, they are relatively prime.
Yes 34 and 39 are relatively prime.........i think so dont trust this answer!:)
39 and 45 are not relatively prime because they have 3 as a common factor. Relatively prime numbers have no common factor greater than 1.
Yes, 16 and 39 are relatively prime. This is because the only greatest common factor they have is 1 that means these two numbers are relatively prime.
All not prime
No. hcf(39, 182) = 13. Their highest common factor would be 1 if they were relatively prime.
No, 13 and 39 are not relatively prime. 13 is a factor of 39.
41 is relatively prime.
Yes 34 and 39 are relatively prime.........i think so dont trust this answer!:)
Yes, 16 and 39 are relatively prime. This is because the only greatest common factor they have is 1 that means these two numbers are relatively prime.
39 and 45 are not relatively prime because they have 3 as a common factor. Relatively prime numbers have no common factor greater than 1.
Yes, 13 and 17 are relatively prime.
All not prime
No. hcf(39, 182) = 13. Their highest common factor would be 1 if they were relatively prime.
17 and 68 are not relatively prime because they have 17 as a common factor.
Two numbers are considered relatively prime if they share no common factors other than 1. In this case, 26 and 39 are not relatively prime because they have a common factor of 13 (13 is a factor of both 26 and 39). Therefore, 26 and 39 are not relatively prime.
Yes, they are relatively prime.
To be relatively prime requires another number, and the highest common factor between 17 and that number must be 1. 17 is relatively prime to all numbers which are not multiples of 17 (since 17 is a prime number).