No.
Both are divisible by 3.
No, 102 and 321 are not relatively prime. Relatively prime numbers only have the number 1 as a common factor. 102 and 321 have other common factors, like 3.
321 = 3*107.
No, 321 is composite. 3 x 107 precludes 321 from being prime on the basis that prime numbers may only consist of a factor of one and itself.
no its composite 1,5,81,and 405
321 = 3 x 107
The prime numbers (factors) of 405 are: 3 and 5
321 is a composite number because it has factors other than 1 and itself. It is not a prime number.The 4 factors of 321 are 1, 3, 107, and 321.The factor pairs of 321 are 1 x 321 and 3 x 107.The proper factors of 321 are 1, 3, and 107 or,if the definition you are using excludes 1, they are 3 and 107.The prime factors of 321 are 3 and 107.The distinct prime factors (listing each prime factor only once) of 321 are also 3 and 107.The prime factorization of 321 is 3 x 107.NOTE: There cannot be common factors, a greatest common factor, or a least common multiple because "common" refers to factors or multiples that two or more numbers have in common.
No, they are not relatively prime.
It can be. 34 is relatively prime to 35. 34 is not relatively prime to 40.
It can be. 26 is relatively prime to 27. 26 is not relatively prime to 34.