answersLogoWhite

0

No, 102 and 321 are not relatively prime. Relatively prime numbers only have the number 1 as a common factor. 102 and 321 have other common factors, like 3.

User Avatar

Wiki User

9y ago

What else can I help you with?

Related Questions

Is 321 and 405 relatively prime?

No.


Are 321 and 405 relatively prime?

No :P


Why is 321 and 405 not relatively prime?

Both are divisible by 3.


Are 45 and 102 relatively prime?

No, they're both divisible by three.


45 and 102 relatively prime?

A prime number has only 2 factors which are 1 and itself. Composite numbers are everything else except 1 and 0. 1 and 0 are neither prime, nor composite. 45 and 102 are both composite.


What is the Prime Factorization of 321?

321 = 3*107.


Is 321 prime?

No, 321 is composite. 3 x 107 precludes 321 from being prime on the basis that prime numbers may only consist of a factor of one and itself.


What is 321 in prime factorization?

321 = 3 x 107


What is a number that is not relatively prime to 9?

Any multiple of 3 will not be relatively prime to 9 because they will both have 3 as a common factor. Some of these numbers are 3, 6, 12, 39, 102, and 372.


What are the prime factors of 102?

The prime factors of 102 are: 2, 3, 17


What is the prime factorization 102?

The prime factorization of 102 = 2 * 3 * 17


What are the factors and prime factors of 321?

321 is a composite number because it has factors other than 1 and itself. It is not a prime number.The 4 factors of 321 are 1, 3, 107, and 321.The factor pairs of 321 are 1 x 321 and 3 x 107.The proper factors of 321 are 1, 3, and 107 or,if the definition you are using excludes 1, they are 3 and 107.The prime factors of 321 are 3 and 107.The distinct prime factors (listing each prime factor only once) of 321 are also 3 and 107.The prime factorization of 321 is 3 x 107.NOTE: There cannot be common factors, a greatest common factor, or a least common multiple because "common" refers to factors or multiples that two or more numbers have in common.