It doesn't imply they are congruent. However it doesn't mean they are not either. Not enough information has been given to establish their congruence.
No, you cannot.
False. The statement should be: If the corresponding side lengths of two triangles are congruent, and the triangles are similar, then the corresponding angles are also congruent.
They are simply two congruent parallelograms.
They are congruent triangles.
you can assume that the angles are congruent, but not the sides.
No. Angles are not congruent. (Triangles may be congruent.)
If two angles and a non-included side of one triangle are congruent to the corresponding two angles and side of another triangle, the triangles are congruent by the Angle-Angle-Side (AAS) theorem. This theorem states that if two angles and a corresponding side of one triangle are equal to two angles and the corresponding side of another triangle, then the two triangles are congruent. Thus, the triangles will have the same shape and size.
No, they are similar. They may be congruent, but they need not be.
The Definition of Congruent Figures (which is a proof) says that if two figures have corresponding sides congruent and corresponding angles congruent, then the figures are to be congruent.
Two triangles are congruent if their corresponding sides are equal in length, and their corresponding angles are equal in measure.
Proportional.
They are congruent angles