A square is a special case of a rhombus. A parallelogram is not a rhombus.
a rhombus and a square. a square can be a parallelogram but a parallelogram cannot be a square. a rhombus cannot be a square but a square can be a rhombus. * * * * * A rhombus does not have any lines of symmetry, only a square has two.
Every rhombus is a parallelogram, and a rhombus with right angles is a square.
A rhombus cannot be a square. A rectangle is an equiangular parallelogram. A rhombus is an equilateral parallelogram. A square is an equilateral and equiangular parallelogram. Thus, a square is both a rectangle and a rhombus.
A trapezium, parallelogram, rhombus, rectangle, square.A trapezium, parallelogram, rhombus, rectangle, square.A trapezium, parallelogram, rhombus, rectangle, square.A trapezium, parallelogram, rhombus, rectangle, square.
No. That word is already taken. The square is a rhombus with a right angle.
Yes. A square is a special type of rhombus which is itself a special kind of parallelogram.
A parallelogram need not be a square, it need not be a rhombus but it is a convex shape.
Yes. A square is a special type of rhombus which is itself a special kind of parallelogram.
A square is also -- a quadrilateral -- a parallelogram -- a rhombus -- a rectangle
Yes, but only if it is a square. A square is an equiangular rhombus, and a rhombus is an equilateral parallelogram.
Rhombus is to parallelogram as square is to rectangle. I hope this simple analogy helps