Yes, but then there is no point in using an instrument that is that accurate!
Using the digits of 1345678, there are 210 three digit numbers in which no digit is repeated.
The biggest 4 digit number that can be made from using the digits of 850236, using a digit at most once, is 8653.
1324
1111
Using a calculator will make it easier
If you are using a ruler, measure one digit more than the ruler reports. For instance, if you have a ruler that reports to the nearest millimeter, you will write your answer to the nearest tenth of a millimeter. (Estimate the last digit).
Using the digits of 1345678, there are 210 three digit numbers in which no digit is repeated.
by using calaculator.......it can be estimated......
The biggest 4 digit number that can be made from using the digits of 850236, using a digit at most once, is 8653.
stupid measurement
99,997
A measurement that has a larger number of significant figures has a greater reproducibility, or precision because it has a smaller source of error in the estimated digit. A value with a greater number of significant figures is not necessarily more accurate than a measured value with less significant figures, only more precise. For example, a measured value of 1.5422 m was obtained using a more precise measuring tool, while a value of 1.2 m was obtained using a less precise measuring tool. If the actual value of the measured object was 1.19 m, the measurement obtained from the less precise measuring tool would be more accurate.
the answer is = first 2-digit number by using 48= 28,82 and in 3 digit is=282,228,822,822
There are 27 of them.
1324
1111
one disadvantage is that we could get a measurement mixed up with another measurement.