Perhaps if either:
But in each of those cases, does it really qualify as a pendulum?
∞
It would tend towards infinity
multiply the length of the pendulum by 4, the period doubles. the period is proportional to the square of the pendulum length.
the time period of a pendulum is proportional to the square root of length.if the length of the pendulum is increased the time period of the pendulum also gets increased. we know the formula for the time period , from there we can prove that the time period of a pendulum is directly proportional to the effective length of the pendulum. T=2 pi (l\g)^1\2 or, T isproportionalto (l/g)^1/2 or, T is proportional to square root of the effective length.
time period of simple pendulum is dirctly proportional to sqare root of length...
Infinite
∞
That simply means that the pendulum doesn't feel any gravity, which would make it move.
It would tend towards infinity
i think it is infinite because acceleration due to gravity at the center of the earth is zero and time period of the simple pendulum is given by 2*3.14*sqrt(l/g)....
This pendulum, which is 2.24m in length, would have a period of 7.36 seconds on the moon.
Don't know whether this is right but ... The period of a pendulum is the time required for one complete cycle - a swing from right to left :)
multiply the length of the pendulum by 4, the period doubles. the period is proportional to the square of the pendulum length.
the period
the time period of a pendulum is proportional to the square root of length.if the length of the pendulum is increased the time period of the pendulum also gets increased. we know the formula for the time period , from there we can prove that the time period of a pendulum is directly proportional to the effective length of the pendulum. T=2 pi (l\g)^1\2 or, T isproportionalto (l/g)^1/2 or, T is proportional to square root of the effective length.
Second's pendulum is the one which has 2 second as its Time period.
time period of simple pendulum is dirctly proportional to sqare root of length...