40
20,2
10,2,2
5,2,2,2
Use a factor tree.
The factor tree of 29 would consist of only the number 29 itself, as it is a prime number. Prime numbers have only two factors: 1 and the number itself. Therefore, the factor tree for 29 would simply show 29 at the top with no further branches or factors.
Since prime numbers only have one prime factor (themselves), factor trees are unnecessary.
64 2,2,2,2,2,2
59 is a prime number and as such has only two factors: 1 and 59 A factor tree doesn't make sense for prime numbers since it would only have one branch: the number itself.
Every composite number has its own unique tree, so I guess the answer is all numbers have one tree. Perhaps you meant one branch or one factor. Prime numbers only have two factors, one of them is prime, so if you try to do a factor tree with a prime number, it stops the second you write the number down. And then there's one. One only has one factor, so we won't even bother with a tree. We'll call it a factor twig.
11 is a prime number. Prime numbers don't have trees. Their only prime factor is themselves.
A factor tree of number is (I think) the numbers that multiply together to form a product. They are prime numbers, too.
as you can obviously see the bottom of a factor tree would be the curious numbers of 2,2,3,5
103 is prime, so it's only factors are 1,103
NEVER! A factor tree is strictly division. Factors at the end of a factor tree should all be whole numbers.
yes