They look like two intersecting lines that make four right angles. Like the two lines in this L.
No, but a diagram of twoperpendicular lines:|||--------------||Two lines are perpendicular if they meet at 90o.
Perpendicular means "at right angles to". L is an example of two lines that are perpendicular to one another.
Put 2 lines on the perpendicular sides and put 1 line for the parallel sides
You would use this: ┴
When straight lines are perpendicular to each other they create right angles of 90 degrees
Two lines that form a right angle are Perpendicular. This can be show by an upside down T.
Perpendicular is mostly used to describe Shapes and their properties. It means when two lines meet up at a 90 degrees right angle. It might be an X or a T when you look at it. Like the example shown below:------------------------------------lllllSo that isn't a good drawing, but it does show you the meaning of perpendicular!
Whether perpendicular lines meet at right angles depends on what they are perpendicular to. Perpendicular is a relational word; this is perpendicular to that.When a pair of lines are perpendicular to each other, they are properly called "mutually perpendicular". Many people (including mathematicians) say just "two perpendicular lines" when they really mean mutually perpendicular, if it is clear from the context that that is what is meant.However, there exists at least one teacher, at least one of whom is a mathematician, who will on at least one occasion attempt to catch out at least one of his students by leading that student to make an assumption the validity of which has not been rigorously proved.This often happens when a teacher is trying to show his pupils the art of rigor in mathematical proof. (The previous paragraph is to give you some idea of what a rigorous proof looks like.)Just to formally answer the question, mutually perpendicular lines on a plane always meet at right-angles - that's what perpendicular means.
Show-trimmed Bedlington Terriers look like lambs. However, Bedlingtons from working lines look more like Irish Wolfhounds (except for the size).
In analytical geometry (geometry with numbers for coordinates), the easiest method is to show that they have the same slope.You could also prove that the distance between the lines, at different parts, is the same (draw a perpendicular to one of the lines).In analytical geometry (geometry with numbers for coordinates), the easiest method is to show that they have the same slope.You could also prove that the distance between the lines, at different parts, is the same (draw a perpendicular to one of the lines).In analytical geometry (geometry with numbers for coordinates), the easiest method is to show that they have the same slope.You could also prove that the distance between the lines, at different parts, is the same (draw a perpendicular to one of the lines).In analytical geometry (geometry with numbers for coordinates), the easiest method is to show that they have the same slope.You could also prove that the distance between the lines, at different parts, is the same (draw a perpendicular to one of the lines).
no, not here you can only type on here but they're two lines that cross you can ask somebody around you
On a map that uses contour lines to represent height, a flat plain should show very few (if any) contour lines.