Yes, it could.
The sampling error is the error one gets from observing a sample instead of the whole population. The bigger it is, the less faith you should have that your sample represents the true value in the population. If it is zero, your sample is VERY representative of the population and you can trust that your result is true of the population.
The sample consisted of the entire population.
I believe you are considering the sampling error as calculated from data. I will give you some examples: If you get the exactly same response from all participants in a survey, you will calculate zero sampling error. For example, if I ask 10 people if Obama Barack is the President of the US, I would probably get 10 "yes" responses. Now the answer was well known, so I would expect very few "no" response. If your measurements are not very sensitive or are recorded with a lack of precision, then there can be zero sampling error. For example, I take the body temperature of students at the college and consider any temperature from 97 to 99 degree F to be normal. I find all students in my sample have normal temperatures. So, zero sampling error can occur because a) sample is small, b) variation in response is either non-existent or very small. In theoretical calculations, where sample error is based on the probability distribution of the population, one can calculate for discrete variables, the probability that a sample error will be zero.
Zero error occurs when a measuring instrument does not read zero when the true value is zero. To calculate zero error, you take a measurement of a standard reference (ideally zero) and note the difference between this reading and the expected value of zero. Zero correction is then determined by subtracting the zero error from your subsequent measurements to adjust them to the true value. For example, if the zero error is +2 units, you would subtract 2 from all future readings to correct them.
The sum will be zero or close to zero, depending on how the sampling was done. See related question.
#DIV/0!
To remove zero error from a micrometer, first ensure that the micrometer is closed completely without any object between the measuring surfaces. Then, check the reading on the scale; if it does not read zero, note the error value. Adjust the micrometer’s zero setting, if it has one, or account for the error in future measurements by subtracting the zero error from your readings. Finally, recalibrate the device regularly to maintain accuracy.
The value returned by the main function is returned to the OS as the programs error number. An error number of zero usually indicates there is not an error but this is up to the programmer to decide.
zerro error in a spring balance affects the accuracy in the weight. To find zero error in spring balance, you have to first find the least count of the spring balance and then suspend it freely, if the outcome is +1, the zero error is +1 and if it is -1 ,the zero error is -1.
Assuming that Excel's default DIV/0! error detection isn't enough for you... You could use the IF() operator to check the value of the divisor, and return something appropriate if it turns out to be zero.
if the zero line of vernier scale is not conciding with main scale the zero error exists.Knowing the zero error necessary correction can be made to find correct measurement..Such a correction is called zero correction
Positive zero error means, instead showing zero it shows some value more than zero. Hence positive. Suppose if it shows some reading say 0.03 units. then while correcting we have to subtract the above from the observed reading. So correction is adding negative error.