2 x 2 x 2 = 8
64 is both a perfect square and a perfect cube. It is a perfect square because (8 \times 8 = 64) and a perfect cube because (4 \times 4 \times 4 = 64).
8
The length of the perfect cube is 2 when the volume is 8 cubic feet.
A cube is any number multiplied by itself three times, eg 2 cubed = 2³ = 2×2×2 = 8; 1.5³ = 1.5×1.5×1.5 = 3.375 A perfect cube is an integer (whole number) that is the cube of an integer, eg 8 is a perfect cube as it is 2 cubed, but 9 is not a perfect cube as 9 = 2.08008382...³
A perfect cube is the cube of an integer (whole number). This means that, for n to be a perfect cube, n = x3, x∈ℤ Eg. ±1 [=(±1)3], 8 [=(±2)3], ±27 [= (±3)3], etc.
The number 8 is not a perfect square because it is not classified as the product of two positive integers. The number 8 is classified as a perfect cube, however.
No, 30 is not a perfect cube. A perfect cube is a number that can be expressed as the cube of an integer, such as (1^3 = 1), (2^3 = 8), or (3^3 = 27). The cube root of 30 is approximately 3.11, which is not an integer, confirming that 30 cannot be written as the cube of any whole number.
How about 64 which is cube and square number because 4*4*4 = 64 and 8*8 = 64
8 is a perfect cube; it is not a perfect square. Its square root is a fraction and the square root of a perfect square is always an integer....you're thinking of 9...
It could be any one of them: 3: A 1-digit perfect square - 1 which is not a perfect cube. 7: A perfect cube - 1 8: A 1-digit perfect square - 1 which is also a perfect cube. 15: A perfect 4th power - 1 30: More than 1 away from a perfect power.
no it is not 4 is a perfect cube
If by cube you mean perfect cube (a cube of an integer), then no, and the nearest perfect cube is 81.