The LCM of a set of numbers can never be smaller than the largest number in the set.
No.
No. At most, it can be equal to the smaller number.
No, it is never bigger than the smaller number.
No, it is never bigger than the smaller one.
A number can't have a factor greater than itself, so the GCF of a pair of numbers can't ever be greater than the smaller number. The GCF of 9 and 18 is 9.
That just has to do do with the font that was used.
Negative numbers are smaller than zero and are considered less than positive numbers. For example, -1 is smaller than 0, and -5 is smaller than -1. The further a negative number is from zero, the smaller its value. Thus, all negative numbers are less than any positive number.
I suspect the answer you are looking for is an outlier.
I can't give you an example of when that happens because that doesn't ever happen. The GCF of a pair of numbers can't be larger than the smaller number.
No, because there is an infinite number of possibilities smaller from the larger gives
It's the one number on the list for which half of the other numbers on the list are bigger than it is, and the other half of the numbers on the list are smaller than it is.
nope never ever