I suspect the answer you are looking for is an outlier.
Neither.There are other numbers that are bigger or smaller.Neither.There are other numbers that are bigger or smaller.Neither.There are other numbers that are bigger or smaller.Neither.There are other numbers that are bigger or smaller.
You have two numbers. You want to know which one is bigger and which one is smaller. Start counting . . . one, two, three, four . . . etc. -- The one you get to first is the smaller one. -- The one you get to last is the bigger one.
> means greater than. You put the bigger number on the left side of the symbol. Just remember that the left side of > is bigger and the right side is smaller. So the bigger numbers goes on the bigger side and the smaller number goes on the smaller side.
The smaller number of the two is 11. The other is 13.
Subtract rational number A from the other rational number B. If the answer is> 0 then B is bigger than A= 0 then B is equal to A< 0 then B is smaller than A
Neither.There are other numbers that are bigger or smaller.Neither.There are other numbers that are bigger or smaller.Neither.There are other numbers that are bigger or smaller.Neither.There are other numbers that are bigger or smaller.
It's the one number on the list for which half of the other numbers on the list are bigger than it is, and the other half of the numbers on the list are smaller than it is.
You have two numbers. You want to know which one is bigger and which one is smaller. Start counting . . . one, two, three, four . . . etc. -- The one you get to first is the smaller one. -- The one you get to last is the bigger one.
> means greater than. You put the bigger number on the left side of the symbol. Just remember that the left side of > is bigger and the right side is smaller. So the bigger numbers goes on the bigger side and the smaller number goes on the smaller side.
47 is a factor of 94: 47*2 = 94.Suppose you are looking for the GCF of two numbers and that that one of the numbers is a multiple of the other. Then their GCF is always smaller of the two number.Every number is a factor of itself, so the smaller number is a factor of itself. Also, if the bigger number is its multiple, then it must also be a factor of the bigger number. So it is a common factor.Now, any number that is bigger than the smaller of the two numbers cannot be its factor. So, the common factor found earlier must be the greatest such number.
The LCM of a set of numbers can never be smaller than the largest number in the set.
The smaller number of the two is 11. The other is 13.
well first off, 0 means that there is nothing there or that your solution is equal to zero. if you have a negative number, then that number is officially smaller or now a lower number than zero because a negative number is of course smaller than a positive or neutral number like zero.
The LCM is the larger number.
Subtract rational number A from the other rational number B. If the answer is> 0 then B is bigger than A= 0 then B is equal to A< 0 then B is smaller than A
Then it follows as the night the day that each of the other numbers, individually and collectively, is less than 6.
If the signs at the front of the numbers are different then the one with the negative sign is smaller. So the question can be simplified to ordering two numbers that have the same sign. Suppose they are both positive numbers. If one of them has a smaller exponent (power of 10) than the other, then that number is smaller. That then leaves two positive numbers with the same exponent. So the only difference is in the mantissa (or the bit before the power of 10). Since the powers of 10 are the same in both cases, the smaller mantissa gives the smaller number. Going back to the case where both numbers are negative: their ordering is the same as for negative integers, for example. The bigger absolute value gives the smaller negative number.