answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

8+8+8/8=3

User Avatar

Wiki User

11y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: How do you get the answer 3 from using only 8 8 8 8 in order of operations?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

What is the order of operations for 35?

There is no order of operation for a single number. And even if there were a binary operator between the 3 and the 5, that would be only one operator and so the question of order would not arise.


How much is (4 plus 3)3?

(4+3)3 → Using order of operations, solve the bracket first. (7)3 → Multiply 21


What is 2 and square root of 6 divide by square root of 3?

Using the order of operations, the answer is 2 + sqrt(2).


How do you make thirteen with the numbers 3 2 4 and 1 using order of operations?

4+1=5... 5x2=10... 10+3=13 !


Why does the order of operations matter?

Order of operations matters because you could potentially get an incorrect answer by not using it. e.g. (/ means divide by or represents a fraction [same thing]) 13+2/3 without brackets is 41/3 while (13+2)/3 = 15 Brackets Exponents (powers) Multiplication Division Addition Subtraction If you perform your operations by this rule you will always gain the correct answer


How do you make -2 using all four operations and only the numbers -1 -2 -3 -5 and -7?

[(-2) + (-1)]/(-3) * [(-7) - (-5)]


Use order of operations 3(-6)^2-5(-5)^2?

its -17 i think but other than that i agree that the fact i in 6th grade only 11 and answering this.


What is the smallest whole number that you can find using 2 3 5 7 11 and each arithmetic operation exactly once?

The smallest that I can get, using only the basic operations of arithmetic, is -2310


What operations can you use to get 17 using 2 5 and 3?

Multiplication and addition.


Will you always get the same result in a numerical expression no matter the order in which you perform the operations?

No. Here is a simple counterexample: 1 + 2 x 3 The answer is either 7 (if using the standard convention of doing the multiplication first), or 9 (if you ignore this standard and do the addition first). When doing a series of only additions, or only multiplicatons, you can do the additions (or the multiplications) in any order.


Why thread used?

Threading is a feature in Java where the system can execute multiple operations at the same time. In most cases, the CPU utilization is barely 1% of its capability even if your program is using the most complicated processing logic. So, by spawning multiple threads, we can utilize the CPU better. For Ex: When you are using your PC to use outlook and at the same time write a document using MS Word and are browsing the internet in a browser, you are doing 3 different operations. the Operating system spawns 3 threads in order to meet your requirements and as you switch from one operation to another, the system adapts seamlessly and you have a feeling that the system is doing only the current activity, whereas it is working on all the 3 opeartions using different threads. If your system were to use only one thread, you would not be able to do all these 3 operations simultaneously.


What does it mean to state the meaning of the expression in order of operations?

The order of operation is: 1 Brackets 2 Exponents (power and roots) 3 Multiplication and Division 4 Addition and Subtraction Consider: 3 + 4 x 2 = 11 The 4 x 2 was done first, then the answer 8 + 3 = 11 Using the order of operations: (3 + 4) x 2 = 14 The (3+4) was done first, then the answer 7 x 2 was done last, giving 14 as the correct answer.